- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Star Trek is an ongoing social commentary. Every species represents an aspect of humanity.
They set up the "norm" or stereotypes so that there will be some excitement when good, 3-dimensional characters deviate from the norm. I just watched Soval (Vulcan) on Enterprise share a "chuckle" with Tucker about his well-disguised affinity for humanity. I loved "the Defector" episode of the Next Generation where a Romulan bared his soul to save his culture, at huge personal expense.
It must be noted that Star Trek historically dealt with stereotypes among their human characters as well. Hysterical Scotsmen? Canny Asians? Wise Native American types? Of course they go more complex from there, but the point is, they usually start there.
Basically yes, but then they did change Klingons a bit in The Undiscovered Country.
I have to come out of the transporter and say that I must be a Trek fan. They were supposedly modeled after different countries (or peoples) so I would have to agree with you. Live long and prosper O-uknow.
Do you know a Star Trek fiction site?
by Pluffy on February 10th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Isn't Star Trek a Left-Wing version of The Turner Diaries?
by bearwinston on June 2nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Would you Vulcan nerve pinch your infant if they started crying?
by Have A Nice Day on July 27th, 2011
| 3 people like this
Guys - would you be man enough to be in a physical relationship with a Klingon gal?
by Amorphous Blob on May 21st, 2011
| 4 people like this
Which is the bigger franchise "Star Trek" or "Star Wars"?
by -O-uknow on July 1st, 2011
| 2 people like this
You're reading Is the Star Trek universe full of stereotypes.. Vulcans are logical, Ferengi only care about latinum and Romulans are always treacherous?
Comments
Aye.. agreed.
by -O-uknow on May 11th, 2009