Who would win in a debate: Ron Paul or Barack Obama? and why?
by 
LibertarianMexican
ANSWERS: 15
-
Ron Paul would have answers and Barack would have rhetoric.
-
Obama, because Ron Paul lacks charisma and while he has some good ideas, his scheme to reduce or cut off foreign aid has made him pretty unpopular in the main stream. Saying we should cut off foreign aid to Israel in a debate is sure to get a chorus of boos.
-
they would tie and then Biden would come in and tear them both up..theres a man that can debate.
-
On policy, hands down, Dr. Ron Paul would win a true debate. On style, unfortunately, President Obama would win, so, with the Electorate being what it is, Obama would win overall.
-
Ron Paul!! Show me one thing he has been wrong about!
-
Ron Paul would win, because Obama would not be able to have a teleprompter to look at!!
-
Well winning a debate isn't about being right or wrong. Winning a debate really only amounts to who is better at debating. Ron Paul may win or Obama may win but no matter who wins it has no real bearing on whether either one of them is right or wrong...
-
Ron Paul because obama does not have the vocalubary to do anything but say umm umm.
-
Ron Paul, but the point is moot becuase the media will never allow it. Why?....ask the stock market since Obama got in. As another ABer once said, "Every time Obama opens his mouth the stock market drops." Biggest reason Ron Paul would win, he wouldn't advocate the economy destroying "cap and trade"
-
You know, I like a lot of Ron Paul's stances. But as for a debate, Obama would win it.
-
probably barack cause for some reason people seem to believe every lie out of that guys mouth. as for having valid points and leading the country in the direction it needs to go id say theres no contest. ron paul would destroy obama
-
Ron Paul would probably 'win' a debate with Barak Obama because his positions are easy to articulate, emotionally resonant, and quite popular. The fact that those policies would result in a world very few of us (except the very wealthy) would want to live in is difficult to explain in a debate format. http://world.std.com/~mhuben/onelesson.html 'Oh, for an honest Libertarian who would say "Yes, in Libertopia we'd have rampant quackery, organ-seizure, baby-selling, slavery in all but name - BUT THAT'S FREEDOM!"' ---Seth Finkelstein
-
It would depend on whether Obama gets to screen all the questions ahead of time and have his answers set up on a teleprompter.
-
The only way Obama could win, is if he has his teleprompter. With out his teleprompter Obama is a total bumbling idiot. His eloquence fades away very quickly. Obama also wears a mic in his ear so people can tell him what to say.
-
Ron Paul the great anarchist? Obama would bury him.. Paul: Let's turn the clock back to 1930! Obama: You're an idiot.. Obama wins.
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC