Would you rather be eaten by a lion in Africa, or by a cannibal tribe in the South Pacific?
by 
Positively Negative
ANSWERS: 8
-
Definetly a lion. Lions have been known to attack humans, but being eaten by a cannibal is just to screwed up twisted for me. Plus I don't think the lion is going to drag it out, or wear me.
-
The cannibals.With my luck the lion would be teaching the other lions and cubs how to pounce there prey.So it would a long and painfull death
-
Cannibal tribes dont exist in the South Pacific anymore, the last would have probably been in the 17-18th century, back in the old days. As for your question I would rather the to be eaten by a "cannibal tribe", at least you can reason with them, with animals you can't talk to them, lol
-
I would say cannibal tribe, because they would give me the chance to give myself a painless death, being killed by a lion would be more horrific.....and if it's a dignity thing, i don't care
-
I think I would have a less painful death if I were to be eaten by cannibals in the South Pacific so I'll go with option B. Plus I know I would be providing nourishment. That ain't right, Lord I apologize for that right there and be with the starving pygmies down there in New Guinea there, Amen.
-
Definitely the cannibals. If I had to pick a way to go, I'd prefer to end up in a cannibal's stomach, providing nourishment for other human beings. As a kid, I always wondered why the fictional Robinson Crusoe didn't give up his Western trappings, and join Friday's cannibal tribe. Food for thought...eat or be eaten.
-
id choose the lion id love to be eaten by a lion.
-
Has to be the lion. That would be a great experience and one to tell my friends about afterwards!!!!!!!!!!! LoL :-/
RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC