Should we do product testing on criminals instead of animals?
by 
Tonylivesinthewoods
ANSWERS: 19
-
Yes that isn't a bad idea!!!! I'm surprised P.E.T.A. hasn't suggested that already. I'll suggest it to them.
-
LMAO thats an awesome idea!!! Especially the child molesters and murderers!!
-
Sounds tempting, doesn't it? Can't though, it would be a violation of their rights. Why should they still have rights as criminals? Ask your favorite liberal. And a special thanks for the anonymous -5 on May 13, 2009. Wish you had the guts to back it up with a comment. Maybe then we could have an intelligent discussion.
-
Yes definatly,they have done their crimes and some have been horrific!!!Why test on animals they are defenseless and have done no harm to anyone or anythink!
-
Yes, but only with their informed consent to it. Just because people forfeit some of their rights when they go to jail doesn't mean they're not people with the same human rights as the rest of it.
-
YES! I'm actually making a persuasive essay in my english class at Virgil Middle School about that subject!!! That's an awesome idea!
-
products should be tested with consent. if the incarcerated person consents and gets something out of it.. then why not. if its dangerous i would say no. products should definitely NOT be tested on animals!
-
Yes. They do the crime, they should pay the penalty. I hate the fact that murderers and rapists who don't have any remorse are living it up in a prison with tv, internet, free food, bedding etc are living off my (tax payers) money. They should be getting experimented on!
-
Yes , it would make them of some use to the world at large but of course the Courts of Human Rights would never allow anything sensible to be done in these situations.
-
No. Everyone can make a mistake; why put someone through what you wouldn't want to go through yourself. I don't like rabbits tested on either, even if they have a mean streak a mile wide.
-
The people who have been testing on animals do seriously have to think of the animals befor they think of themselfs because how do you think the animals are feeling at the time....
-
Not if it will hurt them, if they want to do that...that's their perogative, but forcing people to do that is wrong, that's why it isn't done.
-
yes!! i think with their consent and as long as the animals get to do the testing....right?? j/k
-
Yes. Can you imagine seeing a bunch of hardened criminals wearing lip gloss? Funny stuff.
-
A criminal is paying their dues to society by being in prison.To test products on them is a form of possible torture and should not be done.It is inhumane.
-
Yes - we should test on criminals. This is how these criminals should repay their debts back to society. The overcrowded jails & the burden of the tax payer's money that goes into supporting them isn't right. Why are we paying the price to support people who haven't done nothing for society? Death by lethal injection is a waste. We should put these people to better use. As for testing on animals, not only is it sad & horrific given their innocence, the results in a different species may not produce the same results in human beings. So it is a waste. That's another reason to test on criminals.
-
Maybe we should lobotomize clones of criminals and do the testing on them.
-
No, they are humans and we don't do product testing on humans, at least not in a civilized society.
-
The Japanese used to do production with criminals. As the final step of sword manufacture, they would heat the sword red-hot and stab (or slice) it into a criminal. Dunno what the crimes were.
Answerbag_fan RELATED QUESTIONS
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC