by TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT on February 14th, 2012

TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT

Poll

Help answer this question below.

which do you think is the better option?

any individual can find a niche to fill but the masses can not, our civilization is set up in a way which necessitates most people to perform in common employment roles. my options are not a false dilema, atleast 1 or more of those conditions must exist within our social structure... actually the first option would inherently have a strong dose of the 4th

there is no diety name "the market" which controls wages... executives control wages. the market is merely the environment in which they operate. to say "what the market will bear" defines economic policy is declare economic anarchy. it allows those with financial power to abuse those without financial power. so, which of the following options do you think is the right aproach to creating a fair and just society?

Embed
  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 5 helpful answers below.

  • by susan_madari on February 14th, 2012

    susan_madari

    I would rather a healthy economy, where people can choose their own jobs, or investments, appropriate tax return. and a public social health policy.

    • Like
    • Report

    4 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by TheGrimReefer on February 14th, 2012
    voted: economic slavery (where people must take what ever pay they can get because you can't survive without a job)

    TheGrimReefer

    If you don't have skills, you get what you get.

    • Like
    • Report

    3 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Pheasant on February 14th, 2012

    Pheasant

    I don't see free market capitalism as an option up there.

  • by susan_madari on February 14th, 2012

    susan_madari

    None.

  • by TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT on February 14th, 2012
    voted: welfare (society inately denies freedoms, welfare compensates for that loss)

    TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT

    an adequate welfare system which does not yank the rug out from under people when they get to their knees or feet allows the government to keep it's hands out of bussiness and provides an environment in which everyone can operate without micromanagment from the government. even teh minimum wage can be eliminated with an adequate welfare system and by not yanking the rug out from under recipients they are only made wealthier by finding an employer who will pay them a fair wage. also it garauntees they have the money to spend to feed the economy as the GDP must coinside closely with the masses ability to consume.
    our current system does not do that, people must be careful not to earn too much money and lose the help they need.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading which do you think is the better option?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads