by FLYxNIGHT on March 23rd, 2007

FLYxNIGHT

Question

Help answer this question below.

So it turns out that the contaminant in the recalled pet food was rat poison; if found to be tampering, and they find the person responsible, what would be an appropriate punishment?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. Showing one answer.

  • by wojoangel on April 23rd, 2007

    wojoangel

    Personally,

    I think the only way to go is to acquire those responsible for "tainting". Then taking them to a secluded area somewhere and hanging them upside down by their ankles with barbed wire. Next would let the most radical violent members of PETA come in and proceed to beat and ravage them to the point of death. Then finally they would all be forced to join all of the illegal immigrants in replacing our troops overseas in iraq with nothing but a canteen and a sign on their backs saying " I hate mohamed". If this seems a little violent to anyone, then chew on this..... If your pet died from this taint, and you tried to sue you would get at the most a few hundred dollars because the law doesnt view animals as part of the family. It views them as possesions, therefore you also could not get pain and suffering.....Still think i am being too cruel. And about the iilegals... Cmon now, that problem has just been going on long enough!!!! Sorry if i have offended anyone!

    Comments
    • HA HA HA that is awesome, nice!!

      emmitt

      by emmitt on April 24th, 2007

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading So it turns out that the contaminant in the recalled pet food was rat poison; if found to be tampering, and they find the person responsible, what would be an appropriate punishment?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads