- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Yes, to propose the idea of diplomatic solutions opposed to warfare.
If i was Bush i'd kill myself
but, really, bush has too much on his plate as it is, and neither iran or syria like him, so i wouldn't attempt. If i was the 2008 president, who ever it will be, then i'd defiantely try. As the leader of the foremost democratic country in the world, and a member of the UN security council it is the president's obligation to try to maintain peace, and a peace conferece including the two countries would be exactly to that extent. (when i say obligation, i don't mean invading countries needlessly, but negotions are safer and more practical)
Time Machine.... Well now that we are in the year 2010... Obama won the election saying he will talk to Iran... He tried to talk... And they are now building Nukes! lol so NO, bad idea... OBAMA sucks!
What do college graduates enter the national guard as?
by Answerbag Staff on May 14th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
How heavy is a Morgan coin?
by Answerbag Staff on May 12th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What does a precinct captain do?
by Answerbag Staff on May 12th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Do you have the CPAC App?
by Mister_Bromide on February 10th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Should I let Jesus guide my hand at the voting polls?
by Mister_Bromide on February 10th, 2012
| 2 people like this
You're reading If you were President Bush, would you hold talks with Syria and Iran? Why? or Why not?
Comments