Ask a Question
or
Create a Poll
  1. Home /
  2. Questions /
  3. Autos & Motorcycles
  4. / Vehicle Code And Legal Issues
  5. / Vehicle Accidents And The Law

by Turbospeed90 on August 1st, 2008

Turbospeed90

Question

Help answer this question below.

3 cars involved in a rear end collision. 1st car has 1 person, 2nd car has 3ppl, 3rd car has 1 person. The 1st and 3rd car's statements match, but all 3 ppl in the 2nd car say diff. Who's statement would be more possible to be true?

  • Like
  • Report
Share:
Other

Answers. 7 helpful answers below.

  • by geek860 on August 3rd, 2008

    geek860

    Rule them all out and go with the evidence at the scene. Barring that, vehicle #2 is likely at fault when it comes to a rear end collision, but vehicle #3 may or may not be liable. Can't say much without pictures, details, etc.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by steelstr45 on August 2nd, 2008

    steelstr45

    Unless the 1st and 3rd car drivers are involved in some kind of scheme to get money from insurance, I'd be more willing to believe the two separate drivers, since they are not related or have any reason to have the same story.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by john pennington on September 19th, 2008

    john pennington

    Driver #3.

    The other people did not know what hit them, until along came driver #3.

    Driver #3 is at-fault.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Medwin on September 17th, 2008

    Medwin

    The people with the best lawyer.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Turbospeed90 on August 4th, 2008

    Turbospeed90

    Here are some pictures of it.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by jobu33 on September 17th, 2008

    jobu33

    I would have a tendency to believe the front vehicle's story, they have no liability in the accident, therefore they have no reason to "twist" the truth. The fact that the front driver's story is the same as the rear driver's story only makes me believe it more.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by john pennington on August 3rd, 2008

    john pennington

    It actually does not matter, concerning vehicle #2.

    The rear vehicle is at-fault, causing a chain reaction.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading 3 cars involved in a rear end collision. 1st car has 1 person, 2nd car has 3ppl, 3rd car has 1 person. The 1st and 3rd car's statements match, but all 3 ppl in the 2nd car say diff. Who's statement would be more possible to be true?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

Related Questions

Professionally Researched

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Three car rear end collision
Rear end collision pictures
Who s at fault in a rear end collision
Three vehicle rear end accident
Rear end collision involving three cars

Answerbag

a Demand Media company