- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Like others have said, breaking a law and committing felony crime are two different things. A felony is categorized as such specifically because it's such a serious infraction.
HR professionals likely attach a felon to character traits like dishonesty, laziness, duplicity and independability. And this isn't always wrong. Someone who commits a serious crime has distanced himself from society by hurting his fellow man.
We all get to make choices in our lives. I choose not to commit felonies. The person who does has to live with the consequences. I do think people should be given a second chance and unless a convict can work to sustain himself, he's only being set up for trouble. It's a tough situation to be in and it probably takes a long time to get out of.
It is the never ending price of being in the system. I don't know what most people expect, but I expect that a felon denied an honest way to make a living will turn to crime to support themselves. Which puts them back into the system. It is a vicious cycle that seems to serve no purpose.
Yes, you are right people have broken the laws and not been caught. It is sad that this fact makes it pretty easy for some to hypocritically disregard the true dilemma felons face.
I agree with Meg, there is a big difference between a speeding ticket and a felony armed robbery.
This is really a catch 22 situation and I have mixed feelings, I think WHAT the felony was for should be a bigger factor than just a felony.
But then there is the side that also says that they have paid their dues and should be mainlined back into society. To be honest, I'm really not sure where I stand on this...it would really depend on the crime.
Sure, no one is perfect and it's true: not one of us can honestly say we haven't broken some sort of law, but there is a is a VAST difference between a person who has exceeded the speed limit a time or two and a person who has been to prison for armed robbery and agravated assault.
I guess the problem is the documentation and I don't really think everyone HAS. If you are an employer and you have two candidates who are alike but one has a criminal record What would you do? We ALL know before we commit a crime that, if we are caught, there are consequences. If you don't like the cosequences why take the risk. If we knew the outcome prior to doing it we wouldn't.
It's widely believed in HR circles that the best predictor of future performance is past behaviour. Most employers feel it's a great liability to hire on cons. I managed several Friendly's and have had numerous occasions where the Sheriff's grabbed a co worker in mid shift.
What is a skills gap analysis?
by Answerbag Staff on April 21st, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Which is the best place to Migrate
by bhupesh070 on February 4th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Can you work part time on an H1-B?
by Answerbag Staff on April 3rd, 2010
| 1 person likes this
How do i set objectives for job performance?
by Answerbag Staff on March 31st, 2010
| 1 person likes this
what are your thoughts?? see descritption
by Secretive Woman on February 5th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading I knowFelonsDeserve some punishment equalTo what they doBut why do employers discriminateSo much on hiring a felon and what doPeople expectEx felons to do if they cant survive?allPeople at oneTime in their life haveBrokenA law just got havent been caught
Comments