ANSWERS: 5
-
I support the picture. It's called the 1st amendment.
-
If the "art" consists of the injury/torture/death of a living creature, animal or human...it is not art. It simply is a sadistic maniac documenting his depravity. How would he like if someone did that to him? Would he do that to a human? Or does he simply think animals are disposable?
-
I think this bastard whoever did that to the Dog needs to be put away and should not be aloowed to have any more pets! It upset me very much
-
I won't look at it but inflicting torture and pain on a living being without their consent is not art. If he wants to do it to himself that may be a different story tho.
-
Anyone can tell your grandmother to f--k-off, but is it really art?
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 