| The last question was answered in just | 3 | minutes Let our thousands of members help! |
Welcome to Answerbag, a community of people sharing what they know.
Sort answers by:
Rating |
Date
Top Answer out of 5 by Anonymous on Mar 29, 2008 at 1:00 pm Permalink
Comments
Hi Anon I just saw this on AOL news.
Reversing itself, Wal-Mart has given up its fight against Debbie Shank, a former employee who suffered severe brain damage after a traffic accident. Shank, 52, received about $470,000 from the retailer's health plan for medical expenses, and the the company had sued to get the payout back after she won money in a settlement.
This was probably a wise decision on Walmarts part. They probably would have suffered more than half a million dollars in bad publicity if they continued the fight. However, it doesn't make the suit (or more accurately, the defense) any less frivolous.
Agreed!
Answer 2 out of 5 by Rude Bear Ready for Winter on Mar 29, 2008 at 10:48 am Permalink
Comments
Yes I read about that clause, they are just so greedy in my eyes. If they would have made an exception for her it would have opened the door for others to not have to pay back the Giant!
You're right though, the only way to really hurt them is to not shop there.
amen!! I worked there when I was younger and it is hell. WE ARE FAMILY is a joke. I dont shop at that place either!!
Thanks for your input contraryone! Glad you moved on.
Answer 3 out of 5 by brewscrew on Apr 3, 2008 at 8:15 am Permalink
Comments
Yes, I saw that on the news! I do feel happy for the ex- employee.
Answer 4 out of 5 by Rei de jinn - soi un rei lop. on Mar 29, 2008 at 1:01 pm Permalink
Comments
I felt the same way... they're big bullies aren't they.
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Important: Answerbag cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers submitted by members, and we recommend that you use common sense when following any advice found here. Read full disclaimer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||

