- NEW!
by Jimmyp on March 2nd, 2008
Buddhists would say the lack of desire is the key to happiness. No desire for material objects would be blissful.
by royal77 says hello friend on March 2nd, 2008
That would not be a bad idea to be more conservative. I just hope we get over the materialism and become more cultural and civil.
by Twhupfold on March 2nd, 2008
No, we should colonise space! : D
by Daneca on March 8th, 2008
Yeah, I read some study that showed once your basic needs have been met, material objects won't make you any happier.
by Galeanda on March 2nd, 2008
I think the world would be a finer place, a healthier place if people were happier and satisfied with simpler lives, using less, impacting less, and were more generous towards all, humble enough to think of other people's need and give way so everyone could be happy. But these things can't ever be reached without people's hearts being changed first. No government or party, or great leader can accomplish this.
How do I legally change a name after marriage?
by Answerbag Staff on June 2nd, 2010
| 2 people like this
How long after marriage can a female change her name?
by Answerbag Staff on June 2nd, 2010
| 1 person likes this
What can you peel?
by Erin 6 hours ago
| 2 people like this
What does it cost to change your name?
by Answerbag Staff on May 21st, 2010
| 2 people like this
![Escape from Purgatory [J]](http://ui.abimg.net/images/avatars/50/2a99987e34199683752f275c3866babb.jpg){kind=small}
Is there anything your life you consider "holy"?
by Escape from Purgatory [J] 7 hours ago
| 1 person likes this
You're reading We live in a materialistic society. The world is a limited resource. Should we pursue a more conservative materialsim?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
It sure would. Thank you for your input Jimmyp, parsec
by Parsec13 on March 5th, 2008