by Zebulon on February 22nd, 2008

Zebulon

Question

Help answer this question below.

Does it make sense to anyone that Grey Wolves, one day after being taken off the endangered species list, are now okay to hunt? Can't we give them a bit of time before we start their species back on the downward slide?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 11 helpful answers below.

  • by RosieGHM Jetpacker on February 22nd, 2008

    RosieGHM Jetpacker

    No it doesn't and it didn't when the story broke..however, how much do you want to bet that the NRA is involved somehow? Let's get our hunters out there..let's arm them with lots of bullets..let's give them another worthy target! :(

    • Like
    • Report

    6 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Galeanda on March 19th, 2008

    Galeanda

    It seems half the wolves are in Idaho alone and they claim they need to 'manage' their population. IN total there are 1500, so half would be about 750. It doesn't make sense how they needed protection one month and then the very next one, they have become a problem, even with very controlled numbers taken and a season. But once you take them off that list, they go under the care of each state that they are in:-(

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by hocobo on March 19th, 2008

    hocobo

    Yes, it makes sense. Being legal to hunt doesn't mean that people can go shooting them willy nilly, it means that the state where the wolves are living can issue permits for hunting wolves... it is the states responsibility to maintain the wolf population, and especially nowadays, having a thriving wolf population makes sense due to the revenue brought in with tourism and hunting permits...

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Im Alec has abandoned this account on March 19th, 2008

    Im Alec has abandoned this account

    I don't see what distinction yo are making here. Endangered spacies cannot be hunted, unendangered specieds can me hunted. "Not endangered" means the sam eas "can be hunted". The "endangered" marker should not be take off until it is safe to hunt them - that is what it means. It should not be done until there are a sufficently large number that hunting does not put them at risk. Of course, I am not saying whether it is right or wrong to take that step at this time, just that allowing hunting is what the step means.

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Cyndi Ninja on February 22nd, 2008

    Cyndi Ninja

    Wow, that seems a bit backwards to me...besides, why would a species like that in general ever be ok to hunt? What is the point?

    • Like
    • Report

    4 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Bull wears a COAT of many colours on August 11th, 2009

    Bull wears a COAT of many colours

    What? And deprive those poor guys the chance to kill something else. Where's your heart man?

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Neko5327 on August 11th, 2009

    Neko5327

    I hate hunters! leave the poor animals alone :'( we're supost to RESECPT animals not hurt or kill them T~T

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Brian on March 19th, 2008

    Brian

    It doesn't make sense to me either.

    They should be moved up to the Federally Threatened Species list and given a chance to repopulate to a thriving level.

    http://dnr.state.il.us/espb/datelist.htm

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Rollie on March 19th, 2008

    Rollie

    According to what I heard and read, they are NOT ok to hunt. However, ranchers are killing them illegally because they pose a treat (real) to their livestock. You cannot buy a license to hunt them any more that you could when they were on the endangered species list. Being off the list doesn't mean it's ok to hunt them. There's a real problem here that extends to more than wolves. How many wild animals should there be that destroy people's property and livelyhood in order to protect the wild animals?

  • by Aquatic Eagle on August 7th, 2008

    Aquatic Eagle

    I think that a species is not taken off of the list when it reaches a minimum, it is usually taken off after the population numbers have grown to a significant buffer.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Philip_H9732 on December 31st, 2011

    Philip_H9732

    It just does not make sense to hunt a species that you have just managed to make survive.What is it with these people who want to still go on hunting animals for fun?

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Does it make sense to anyone that Grey Wolves, one day after being taken off the endangered species list, are now okay to hunt? Can't we give them a bit of time before we start their species back on the downward slide?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads