- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Both have the immediate results of a guilty plea in terms of sentencing consequences. Importantly, an Alford plea can result in the offense being treated as a "prior" in the case of a subsequent offense, whereas a nolo contendere plea will not.
Should Bernie Madoff be pardoned and put in charge of The Social Security Administration?
by bearwinston on December 13th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
My ex girlfriend works for aus goverment and she has been taking unauthorised funds from my bank account i went to her employers office today to ask the question if convicted would she loose her job they said yes should i go that far ? no names mentioned
by Anonymous on August 27th, 2009
| 1 person likes this
What is the possible sentence for committing "registration fraud", a felony in the state of indiana?
by Anonymous on September 8th, 2009
| 1 person likes this
My ex was authorized on my credit cards. He ran up $15k in charges before I cut it off. Do I have any options here? State is IL.
by Jim_D4523 on October 12th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Should it be called stealing if you raise funds under false pretenses?
by Anonymous on June 15th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Would you recommend entering an Alford plea or pleaing Nolo Contendere in a grand larceny case?
Comments
What do you mean by 'treated as a prior' i don't understand that part. I do not have a single crime on my record.
by Anonymous on January 17th, 2008
An Alford plea is simply a form of a guilty plea, and, as with other guilty pleas, the judge must see there is some factual basis for the plea. Therefore, a defendant's prior conviction via an Alford plea can be considered in future trials; and it will count as a "strike" if a three strikes law applies. A plea of Nolo Contendere is note an admission of guilt.
by Anonymous on January 17th, 2008