ANSWERS: 21
-
They both could be true... In terms of most likely, though, Option 2 is the one I'd say
-
As far as I know, neither. The first is false (as far as I know) and the second is a contradiction and thus false. The first is more feasible than the second, though.
-
1 is the most likely but both if you smoke waccy baccy :o)
-
Both are untrue
-
Both could be true to the non believer but here is a pic of my pet.
-
An existing unicorn must exist. Given your two possibilities, an existing unicorn does not exist would not make sense logically.
-
i would say one, as a unicorn is just a horse with a horn, im sure you can find one somewhere
-
I think #1 could be true. A unicorn could exist.
-
Well, with the way it is worded, option one would have to be true.
-
As a logical problem, 1 is true, 2 is a logical inconsistency and invalid or false or not true.
-
If one does not believe in the possibility of the existence of unicorns, then even a Unicorn who exists won't be acknowledged by the non-believers. Unicorns have the ability to be invisible..so those who must see to believe, can't believe that which is invisible. Sometimes people see and still don't believe because it goes against their rigid mindset and so they will rationalize the sighting as a hangover, a high fever, or anything else that will calm them. All possibilities exist with Unicorns..simultaneously, consecutively, or any other way..all it takes is for the observer, the experiencer, the sentient being to Believe! :)
-
The existance of an existing unicorn has yet to be proven therefore we cannot say that an existing unicorn does not exist. So, by scientific deduction, we can say than a non-existing unicorn does not exist. Confused yet?
-
i think number one is true because a unicorn is just a horse with a horn <center><table width="350" height="150" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1" bgcolor="black"><tr><td><table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" bgcolor="white"><tr><td valign="top"><font color="Pink" size="1">If a <b>Uni</b>!<br><br>theese cute little horned horses are very brave and they hate getting dirty font></td><td width="150" height="150"><img src="http://images.neopets.com/pets/happy/Uni_rainbow_baby.gif" width="150" height="150" border="0" alt="Which Neopet are you?"></td></tr></table></td></tr></table><font color="black" size="1">Which Neopet are you? Visit <b><a href="http://www.retrograde.org/quizzes/neopets/">http://www.retrograde.org/quizzes/neopets/</a></b> to find out!</font></center>
-
THere is a crazy guy in England who has a one horned goat... He believes it is a unicorn. SO my answer is 3. Relative always wins!
-
By definition, only #1 can be true: If it's "an existing unicorn", then by definition it exists.
-
Ooookay...Saturday night so somebody had one too many drinks, eh?
-
just so you know evidently horses did have horns in history, it seems that they were two horns but none the less it did have horns. second their was a famous discoverer (i forget who) but he went on the search for the famed unicorn, to make a long story short he got to asia and they showed him and it was a Rhino. 3rd evidently their is a real unicorn skeleton you can find it on the web (real unicorn) google that. +2
-
if an existing unicorn did not exist it would cause a paradoxal rip in the space time continuom...thus destroying the world as we know it
-
I think Juan just said it.
-
Statement 1. Why do you ask?
-
think of it this way: if an existing iwnit exists, does an unexisting iwnit exist? the (real) answer was written some years ago by Descarte: "cogito ergo sum" google it
Copyright 2023, Wired Ivy, LLC

by 