by jin jang on December 21st, 2007

jin jang

Question

Help answer this question below.

Aren't the rights of people that appose the carrying of guns in public places,being stepped on ,if they feel unsafe,and in danger of others not qualified in the use of guns? Are not the state laws one sided, in some states ,on this issue?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 2 helpful answers below.

  • by TopspeedFD on December 25th, 2007

    TopspeedFD

    I understand your concerns. Well, I think I do.

    For Americans, the rights of citizens are stated in the US constitution, as well as individual state constitutions. Your state has determined to what extent the second amendment applies. The state will usually err on the side that infringes upon constitutional rights the least. However, they can and do regulate the carrying, sale, and possession of firearms in a manner that they believe benefits the public good the greatest. So, many places have great restrictions on concealed carry, including required gun safety and marksmanship training. Others do not allow concealed carry at all. All of this hinges upon responsibility, of course. It's irresponsible as well as illegal to carry a concealed weapon without the proper authorization. Further, if you choose to carry a weapon, it's irresponsible not to ensure that you have the proper training to use a weapon. If someone has met the states standard for concealed carry, and passed the required classes, and been permitted by the state to carry, then they are qualified by the state. I don't really worry about the guns carried by law abiding citizens. I do worry about guns carried by criminals, who really aren't know for their responsibility.

    Ultimately, the responsibility for personal or family protection rests upon the citizen. The police, while they do try, cannot be held accountable for a citizens welfare unless they're in police custody.


    Which right do you specifically believe is being stepped on? Do you believe that it supersedes a persons right to defend themselves from harm using legal means?

    If you feel strongly enough about it, then you should petition your local government. If you feel something could be harmful to you (i.e., unqualified gun use), I do believe that you're right to do something about it.

    • Like
    • Report

    3 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by Moosemose on December 21st, 2007

    Moosemose

    In what Manner??? They too have the right to Learn How & When to Use Deadly Force in Self Defense.How many "Bad Guys" would be willing to Attack a Senior Citizen who was "Visibly Armed"??? The "Bad Guys" are "COWARDS", PLAIN & SIMPLE!!! They are Animals & Animals "Cull" the "Weak" from the Heard. It sounds as if U have a "Spine Problem" which is OK, as long as U Know U couldn't "Get the Job Done, then I would be afraid to see U Armed! But, be Prepared for the "Consequences" as U "Turn Over" Control of Ur LIFE to a "Bad Guy". John

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading Aren't the rights of people that appose the carrying of guns in public places,being stepped on ,if they feel unsafe,and in danger of others not qualified in the use of guns? Are not the state laws one sided, in some states ,on this issue?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Cost to rebuild home
Appose danger to others
Animals rights in public places