Ask a Question
or
Create a Poll
  1. Home /
  2. Questions /
  3. Social Sciences
  4. / Politics And Modern Events
  5. / More Politics And Modern Events

by Halskiisaklink on October 26th, 2007

Halskiisaklink

Question

Help answer this question below.

One of the justifications GWB is using for invading Iran is avoiding World War III. If Iran was capable of doing this, wouldn't starting a war with the country spark it off?

  • Like
  • Report
Share:
Other

Answers. 5 helpful answers below.

  • by Tinkerbell on October 27th, 2007

    Tinkerbell

    I still find it brilliant that Bush's exit strategy for Iraq is to go through Iran...

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by RosieGHM Jetpacker on October 27th, 2007

    RosieGHM Jetpacker

    Everything we've done so far has made things worse.."the decider" screwed up once and because he has no clue about having done so, is taking us down the exact same path again. A rabid, rigid,focused view and the certainly that he is "right" because God talks to him..in other times we would put someone like that in a mental hospital..now we bow down, roll over and go along! :(

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Im Alec has abandoned this account on October 27th, 2007

    Im Alec has abandoned this account

    I think that is one of the stupidest ideas I have heard. Remember that World war I was triggered by a sing death, and World War II by a big country invading a smaller. Invading Iran is exactly the sort of thing to light the fuse for World War III.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Anonymous on October 26th, 2007

    Anonymous

    I think his justification runs in relation to their potential ability to wage world war three, not their current ability, thus GWB thinks - get in now before they are too powerful.
    I may be wrong in that assessment. I think you are correct though in your questioning, as Iran does have allies who they could get help from, so invading Iran seems like a really really really stupid thing to do. Even more stupid than invading Iraq was.

    I also think that world war three is sort of happening right now anyway - isn't the other euphemism for it the war on terror?

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by The Account Formerly Known As Peyton on October 26th, 2007

    The Account Formerly Known As Peyton

    Dubya kinda has a thing for using stupid excuses for invading places.

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading One of the justifications GWB is using for invading Iran is avoiding World War III. If Iran was capable of doing this, wouldn't starting a war with the country spark it off?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

Related Questions

Professionally Researched

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Good japanese anime
Bush avoided invading iran

Answerbag

a Demand Media company