- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
For as long as Bush has been describing himself as a 'compassionate conservative,' I have wondered whether the coinage was a call for a flexible new ideology or an effort to put a friendlier face on an essentially unchanged philosophy.
We were taught that compassion means caring for the ill, homeless, hungry, unemployed, destitute and defenseless -- So, the son of Barbara and George H. W. Bush, George W, the only President to win re-election after losing the popular vote in his first election, whose agenda of compassion includes highlights such as the war, preventing children from having health insurance, and letting the victims of Katrina drown or suffer in misery and neglect.
Listen to Kedar, he is very passionate about how he feels & he doesn't lie
I am gonna give you something written by Jay Leno to answer your question. Its a bit wordy but puts it all into perspective:
Jay Leno wrote this; it's the Jay Leno we don't often see....
"The other day I was reading Newsweek magazine and came across some poll data I found rather hard to believe. It must be true, given the source, right?
The Newsweek poll alleges that 67 percent of Americans are unhappy with the direction the country is headed, and 69 percent of the country is unhappy with the performance of the President. In essence, 2/3's of the citizenry just ain't happy and want a change.
So being the knuckle dragger I am, I started thinking, ''What are we so unhappy about?''
Is it that we have electricity and running water 24 hours a day, 7 days a week?
Is our unhappiness the result of having air conditioning in the summer and heating in the winter?
Could it be that 95.4 percent of these unhappy folks have a job?
Maybe it is the ability to walk into a grocery store at any time, and see more food in moments than Darfur has seen in the last year?
Maybe it is the ability to drive from the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean without having to present identification papers as we move through each state?
Or possibly the hundreds of clean and safe motels we would find along the way that can provide temporary shelter?
I guess having thousands of restaurants with varying cuisine from around the world is just not good enough.
Or could it be that when we wreck our car, emergency workers show up and
provide services to help all, and even send a helicopter to take you to the hospital.
Perhaps you are one of the 70 percent of Americans who own a home. You may be upset with knowing that in the unfortunate case of a fire, a group of trained firefighters will appear in moments and use top notch equipment to extinguish the flames thus saving you, your family and your belongings.
Or if, while at home watching one of your many flat screen TVs, a burglar or prowler intrudes , an officer equipped with a gun and a bullet-proof vest will come to defend you and your family against attack or loss.
This all in the backdrop of a neighborhood free of bombs or militias raping and pillaging the residents. Neighborhoods where 90 percent of teenagers own cell phones and computers.
How about the complete religious, social and political freedoms we enjoy that are the envy of everyone in the world?
Maybe that is what has 67 percent of you folks unhappy.
Fact is, we are the largest group of ungrateful, spoiled brats the world has ever seen. No wonder the world loves the U.S. , yet has a great disdain for its citizens. They see us for what we are. The most blessed people in the world who do nothing but complain about what we don't have , and what we hate about the country instead of thanking the good Lord we live here.
I know, I know. What about the President who took us into war and has no plan to get us out? The President who has a measly 31 percent approval rating? Is this the same President who guided the nation in the dark days after 9/11? The President that cut taxes to bring an economy out of recession? Could this be the same guy who has been called every name in the book for succeeding in keeping all the spoiled ungrateful brats safe from terrorist attacks?
The Commander-In Chief of an all-volunteer army that is out there defending you and me? Did you hear how bad the President is on the news or talk show? Did this news affect you so much, make you so unhappy you couldn't take a look around for yourself and see all the good things and be glad?
Think about it...are you upset at the President because he actually caused you personal pain OR is it because the "Media" told you he was failing to kiss your sorry ungrateful behind every day.
Make no mistake about it. The troops in Iraq and Afghanistan have volunteered to serve, and in many cases may have died for your freedom. There is currently no draft in this country. They didn't have to go.
They are able to refuse to go and end up with either a ''general'' discharge, an ''other than honorable'' discharge or, worst case scenario, a ''dishonorable'' discharge after a few days in the brig.
So why then the flat-out discontentment in the minds of 69 percent of Americans? Say what you want, but I blame it on the media. If it bleeds, it leads; and they specialize in bad news. Everybody will watch a car crash with blood and guts. How many will watch kids selling lemonade at the corner? The media knows this and media outlets are for-profit corporations. They offer what sells , and when criticized, try to defend their actions by "justifying" them in one way or another. Just ask why they tried to allow a murderer like O.J. Simpson to write a book about "how he didn't kill his wife, but if he did he would have done it this way"...Insane!
Stop buying the negativism you are fed everyday by the media. Shut off the TV, burn Newsweek, and use the New York Times for the bottom of your bird cage. Then start being grateful for all we have as a country. There is exponentially more good than bad.
We are among the most blessed people on Earth, and should thank God several times a day, or at least be thankful and appreciative.
"With hurricanes, tornados, fires out of control, mud slides, flooding, severe thunderstorms tearing up the country from one end to another, and with the threat of bird flu and terrorist attacks, "Are we sure this is a good time to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance?"
Jay Leno
2007
It would be nice if wars ended like movies do, but they don't. We have lost fewer troops in Iraq than we did in a single battle of World War II, in fact fewer than on many single ISLANDS in World War II, and less than a twelfth of the casualties in Vietnam.
But if you can't stomach war, get ready for Isalm, because they don't intend to stop if they win in Iraq. They intend to follow us here. And to triple the price of gasoline to pay for it.
Not sure what I have done here
If you have not learned from any of his speaches and actions of his terms of presidency he is always lying except for the one speach and this is not edited he said these words in this order...
"Terrorists will never stop looking for ways to hurt our country and neither will we."
What do George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have in common with Adolf Hitler, Usama bin Laden and Charles Manson?
by calicorey on June 2nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Isn't it funny that libs still blame GWB for everything bad but won't admit every intel asset that got Bin Laden was GWB-created?
by More2Be on May 8th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Why are Bush & Cheney scared to attend the Ground Zero celebration with President Obama?
by Halliburton Shill on May 5th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Why Vincent Bugliosi couldnt get no mainstream media play to talk about his published book The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder?
by Iceander on May 20th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
what now, do you feel Geotge bush's legacy will be?
by Bornabrit on May 18th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading In his initial campaign for the Presidency, George W. Bush, described himself as a "compassionate conservative". What is compassionate about consigning America's youth to a needless and seemingly endless war that has now lasted longer than W.W.II?
Comments
Clinton won with less than half the popular vote in his first election, and blaming the feds for Katrina is a bit silly since the state and local levels failed completely first. The feds are never going to respond instantly to any disaster, it is the state's responsiblity to act immediately. As far as the war, you never really answered the question, just went on some socialist rant.
by thekingcobra63 on October 19th, 2007
Having compassion for poor children is hardly the sole domaine of socialism; indeed, Jesus Christ advocated this, long before caring for people became falsely stigmatized by greedy conservatives as something 'radical' or on the extreme limits of leftist activities.
And your attempt at an ad hominem argument, contained in the word 'socialist' hardly drags up the demons of the Cold War you wish to recall -- Tony Blair and other Europeans allies of the U.S. all self-identify as 'socialists'.
You probably meant communists, veiled by the intended insult of 'socialists', but the ability to insult someone by calling them a socialist began to decline shortly after the McCarthy hearings in the late 1950s, in case you haven't noticed.
by kedar on October 19th, 2007
I noticed that McCarthy was right. Also, you speak of the "greedy COnservatives" but you should look who the richest politicians are, most of your top ten richest politicians in America are Democrats who claim to be for the little man. Caring for someone is not what I was talking about, merely the way you snuck in the health insurance issue as some sort of "compassion" and not socialism in disguise. I did not mean communism, but socialism. There is no place for any more socialist policies in the US. ALso, marking the difference of being an ally and having to have the same doctrine are two seperate issues. Europe can have their socialism, but it doesn't mean it belongs here.
by thekingcobra63 on October 19th, 2007
You'd probably eliminate Social Security as well, right, for it's 'socialist' aspects?
McCarthy was right? Says who? That comment is the most bizarre I've heard in years. Right about what? Paranoia and demonized actors and directors from Hollywood?
That's a bit tough to swallow, since McCarthy's legacy is that of a failed politician associated with attempting to invent a litmus test for Americanism, while employing interrogation and indimidation tactics not unlike the Soviets used -- as he subverted free speech to supposedly protect the U.S. from a trumped up enemy 'among us'.
All desperate right wing extremists revert to attacking reasonablt public poicies as 'socialism'm if they originate with the Democratic Party members -- it's the GOP talking point number #1,345.684b, in case anyone is following along in the right wing handbook of partyspeak.
Peace.
by kedar on October 19th, 2007
He was right that there were communists in hollywood and the government, that has been proven, so it wasn't paranoia but fact. As far as reasonable public policy, what you propose as reasonable is take hard earned money from one to pay the bill for another, that isn't reasonable to me. I will not respond any more to this nonsense.
by thekingcobra63 on October 20th, 2007