I understand what you are saying. However, the individual expressed not only a question about fantasy, but also directly said that this specific fantasy HAS BEEN acted out on several DOGS. To Fantasize in and of itself is not abnormal, even if the fantasy is considered by the individual to be one that might not 'normally" be seen as one acceptable by others or even by the person having the fantasy. I believe that is part of the "fun" of a fantasy. Anyone might choose to fantasize about something, or even someone, they are attracted by, but might not ever be comfortable actually DOING, for whatever reason. Many times people are even able to "live out" their Fantasies, with willing partners, to the mutual pleasure of both parties. Since the writer provided additional information about this aspect of the Fantasy, I decided to address it. Had the writer expressed a desire or fixation towards a different type of Fantasy, but one that still included what would "normally" be considered abuse of the partner in question, be it another adult who was UNWILLING to participate, or a child, I would have responded the same. NORMAL is not using any form of manipulation, or aggression on ANY creature, for what one considers to be a personally satisfying behavior; be it sexual or otherwise in nature. It isn't considered to be acceptable, according to the "rules" of our current society. If both partners or all partners participating in sex, or sexual play are of mental ability to reason, to understand what they are doing and make a willing decision to participate in the activity, then it's consensual, other wise I see a problem. While you can argue that a dog might be perfectly happy to lick gravy, chocolate, peanut butter or whatever off of a human body part...a dog is not normally taught to be sexual with humans, therefor the act of doing it becomes abnormal.

um... no, no its not

The extent to which zoophilia occurs is not known with any certainty, largely because feelings which may not have been acted upon can be difficult to quantify, lack of clear divide between non-sexual zoophilia and everyday pet care, and reluctance by most zoophiles to disclose their feelings due to fear of both social and legal persecution. Instead most research into zoophilia has focused on its characteristics, rather than quantifying it. Scientific surveys estimating the frequency of zoosexual activity, as well as anecdotal evidence and informal surveys, suggest that more than 1-2% -- and perhaps as many as 8-10% -- of sexually active adults have had significant sexual experience with an animal at some point in their lives. Studies suggest that a larger number (perhaps 10-30% depending on area) have fantasized or had some form of brief encounter. Larger figures such as 40-60% for rural teenagers (living on or near livestock farms) have been cited from some earlier surveys such as the Kinsey reports, but some later writers consider these uncertain. Anecdotally, Nancy Friday's 1973 book on female sexuality My Secret Garden comprised around 190 women's contributions; of these, some 8% volunteered a serious interest or active participation in zoosexual activity. Not all people live near animals. Urban dwellers, who usually lack contact with animals, were estimated by Kinsey (1948) to have only one zoosexual contact for every 30 of the average rural dweller. By 1974, the farm population in the USA had reduced by 80% compared to 1940, causing a greatly reduced opportunity for living with animals; Hunt's 1974 study suggests that the demographic changes affecting this one group led to a significant change in overall reported occurrence. Sexual fantasies about zoosexual acts can occur in people who do not wish to experience them in real life, and may simply reflect normal imagination and curiosity. Latent zoophile tendencies may be common; the frequency of interest and sexual excitement in watching animals mate is cited as an indicator by Massen (1994) and commented on by Masters (1962).

having "normal" as what most of the people do, in other words "the norm". No, it is not normal.

No its gross!

I have performed many sexual acts on my dog and he doesn't mind so why have a go at the poster. Each to their own and i personally know about these fantasies having experienced them myself. So what if it's not considered normal, it's still bloody enjoyable. Peace out. Calum. X

large animals, no.....but a chicken in the next yard keeps catching my eye

I dont think its the most common fantacy but ,it is a fantacy and thats what fantacies are for...A lot of us fantisize bout things that are a little bit out there.Ii think yours is jst a little farther than that...