- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
It doesn't say much really. But you can infer some things from what it DOES say:
- Buddhist teaching generally challenges the notion of a fixed self or entity which serves as the core of being. In Buddhist ontology, all things are considered to be composites -- you and I are the result of the conditions which produce our existence, and those conditions are in turn produced by other conditions, ad infinitum. So nowhere can you get your hands on some solid unchanging "essence of being".
This is what it means when Buddhism talks about "no self". It's not that there's no self at all, it's that there's no permanent entity like a core upon which our qualities and characteristics are "glued". The implication for other religions is that Buddhism challenges the existence of the soul as it's normally conceived -- a permanent essence which transcends the conditions of body, time, space, cause-and-effect.
- Buddhism is silent on the existence of God. So in a sense, it does not conflict with religions which place God at the center of everything. Buddhism neither denies nor affirms the existence of God -- that is considered a matter which is outside the scope of Buddhism's concerns. Buddhism is concerned with awakening -- recovering the true nature of being in a practical way which makes a practical difference in ordinary life. It's not particularly interested in large-scale metaphysical questions about the origin of man or the nature of God, etc. Those are basically considered irrelevant to the core problem Buddhism addresses: suffering.
- Buddhism is strongly critical of the human tendency to cling to beliefs of any kind. That doesn't mean Buddhism is intolerant of beliefs in general, it means that CLINGING is considered very unwise. So since many religions implicitly encourage the very clinging that Buddhism is working to disrupt, in that sense Buddhism is anti-religion. However, it is possible (and some people do it) to merge other religions with Buddhism... i.e. I know Christian Buddhists who believe in the redemption offered by Christ, etc., and still practice Buddhism. I presume they've dialed down the clinging aspect of their Christianity to make it all work, but don't really know the details.
In general, Buddhism promotes tolerance and peaceful coexistence as essential qualities to be developed by all humans, regardless of their religious orientation. It would be completely antithetical to Buddhist teachings to (for example) discriminate against others based on their religion, and completely unthinkable to use religious differences to justify a conflict or war. While Buddhism doesn't really promote the notion that "all religions are one", it promotes the notion that all of REALITY is one, and religions are a part of reality as a whole. In that respect, it makes no sense for Buddhism to adopt an aggressive or hostile stance toward other religions.
Why do Buddhists shave their heads? Rather than being a sign of humility, is this not MORE image-conscious, because of the effort required?
by mumpsimus on November 7th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What is your opinion of Buddhism?
by Masaharu on July 7th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Buddha teaches that we should free ourselves from ill feeling towards others - but does that include loathing of truly evil people, too?
by mumpsimus on November 12th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What features of Buddhism and other Eastern religions deal with the suffering caused by mental depression?
by jaflor on August 26th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
If you meet the Buddha on the road, kill him!" Why do the Buddhists say this?
by anil m on October 6th, 2011
| 3 people like this
You're reading What does Buddhism say about 'religions'..?
Comments
Thank you very much for your well thought out and prepared answer... It seems as though we have a lot in common.
I think my next step is to locate my nearest 'buddhist' shop and see how it flows... I do not suscribe to the notion of 'religions' and have no desire to join or belong or become anything - I am quite comfortable in my skin...
To help my neighbours and to help others achieve enlightenment is what really matters to me and it seems that that is the core teaching of Buddhism. I will have to check it out in person...
Everything else kinda falls into place when I do that..
Thanks again...
by bradleybell goes to school on September 27th, 2007
Well yeah, I think your basic approach is very compatible with Buddhism. This is news though, I thought you were a somewhat liberal Christian! Guess I misread something along the way.
by Stableboy on September 27th, 2007
Yeah - I do come across as that on ocassion.
My path has taken me through many 'churches' and I have independantly studied many disciplines including Theology along the way.
I do believe in God and Jesus but not in a way that is compatible to current 'church' thinking. Which is why I can let go of attachments... I can reconcile my thoughts comfortably with most 'religious' teaching. I know and understand their idiom and try to convince where I can.
Some years ago a few of my friends were organising for me to go and study further under a Hindu Guru. They too have paths and diciplines which bring you through to enlightenment, its great stuff but my teeth grow, and I already know english... (well sorta):-)
Reading the works and poems of the Islamic Mystics will also show their 'enlightened' thoughts. If you look - its not hard to see that we all are ONE.
I apologise for the confusion - I try to flow with what is happening at the moment. (Not always successfully as you know.)
by bradleybell goes to school on September 27th, 2007
Well I don't think that "flowing with the moment" precludes being able to work in time-based structures. I manage software projects, which requires being able to anticipate and plan, measure past results, and execute in the present. None of these activities are in conflict with the principle of "being present" -- when I'm thinking about the future, I'm aware that I'm thinking about the future: that awareness grounds the "future" in here-and-now. Likewise with the past.
To me, the concerns are getting "lost" in our contemplating the past or future, and losing touch with the moment in the process. So it's important to me to be able to form coherent paragraphs and compositional structure when writing -- I'm not out to confuse people in the course of serving "be here now".
by Stableboy on September 27th, 2007
Neither am I... What exactly caused the 'confusion' - perhaps I can explain... I stand by everything I have written...
by bradleybell goes to school on September 27th, 2007
You said you "apologize for the confusion - I try to flow with what is happening at the moment". So I surmised that you believe that flowing with the moment is incompatible with clear expression of your thoughts.
by Stableboy on September 27th, 2007
I do not believe that flowing with the moment is incompatible with clear expression. On the contrary. I do realise that I am guilty of 'expecting' the other person to understand. I am a vocal person and my interaction with AB has made me realise that I have **much** to learn as far as written communication is concerned. What was meant by "I try to flow with what is happening at the moment" was simply that when I first joined AB I had a scientific question about light particles that I wanted cleared up, then I saw the Religion Section and thought I'd take a peek. I got completely sucked in, asking, answering, commenting on everything that attracted my attention, even to playing the points game, It took me a while to figure it out and settle down. As most of my 'playing' was done in the Religion section I assumed that is why you thought I was a 'liberal christian'. I really hope I made myself clear and got it right this time :-) Theres always more...
by bradleybell goes to school on September 27th, 2007
Oh, ok! Yeah, I understand. I've spent a lot of time in the religion section too, but I don't do as much as I used to. After a while, it all sounds the same really. Mostly I use Answerbag to hang out with my friends, and occasionally I'll answer a question if I feel very strongly about something. And of course I keep the Buddhism category well covered as a sort of public service. Other than that, I don't really get out much anymore! :)
by Stableboy on September 27th, 2007
:-)
Yeah - It does get a bit boring after a while dealing with all the ego and pride and 'right' and 'wrong' etc. But I did have loads of fun while it lasted...
I contacted my local Buddhist center and found an added benefit - I can learn Tai Chi as well. It was introduced to me as 'meditation in motion' which was a foreign concept to me as at the time I understood meditation as 'being still'. So I got the book to try and understand it but never quite mastered the technique on my own...
What I would like to know more about now is Zen Archery - I believe it is about 'letting go' - Do you know anything about it..?
by bradleybell goes to school on September 27th, 2007
I don't have any experience with that, but all Zen practice forms are about awareness and being present. I do Zen dishwashing! :)
by Stableboy on September 28th, 2007
:-)
Thanks - Cheers for now...
by bradleybell goes to school on September 28th, 2007