- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
I believe that advances could prove that the president was killed by another gunman and for other reasons.
I have always said that there were two gunman. You can clearly see JFK's head fling back as he was shot in the front of his head. It is and alway was obvious to me no matter how much misleading info. is out there.
yeah and they are starting to do it now ...they are saying that there are now 2 shooters and not just one ...which to me is a no brainer
No there will always be theories and a mystery as far as some people are concerned.
Infact new advances in computer 3d graphics have only confirmed the warren commission report.
New 3d graphics show that the SBT is definately doable
and confirm the warren commission findings that Oswald is guilty.
as far as i'm concerned and many others, there never was any mystery surrounding this case, if you understand ballastics then you'd know that any other shot apart from the depository never occured.
If you look hard enough at any murder investigation and want to believe it enough, you can find mystery and conspiracy in anything.
No mystery, dude was capped yo...
Actually I think current technological advances have put the mysteries to rest.
The initial investigation was so botched that I don't believe the U.S. population would believe anything, no matter what advanced technology shows. It's nearly impossible to convince everyone.
New technology has shown (if the report on the open mike tapes are true) that there were more shots fired. And anyone with even half a brain knows how hard the government worked to cover it up with the Warren Commission. Everyone who denies this is in spiritual league with the killers and are probably (unknown even to themselves) children of the Devil.
I doubt it. There will always be those who see a conspiracy afoot.
I don't think so. They have modern technology now and are reviewing the assassination tapes and still aren't coming up with any answers. I believe that his assassination was a government conspiracy, therefore no matter how much technological advances we gain, his assassination will still be a mystery. It has been covered up for so long by so many people, why would that change now?
Spy satellites can see from about 350 miles up. In "x" years perhaps they'll have surveillance sats that can "see" from so far out that it will take "x" years for the light from earth to reach it. Then they can take a look at Dealey Plaza at just the right time. I know, seems far-fetched now, but who knows?
the government can't tell the truth because they are guilty. it's OK by me. what ever trips their trigger. you will never read the truth on this subject until all guilty people are gone and some one opens a new can of worms.
has anyone watched the latest footage of the jfk assasination if not watch the driver of the limo
by THE SHADOW on September 23rd, 2010
| 1 person likes this
The tone of JFK's speech is negative and scolding. True or false?
by Amanda on June 1st, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What are controversy's with the assassination of JFK.
by K1llahDmer on May 11th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
What were the investigative expenses of the Warren Commission?
by Lukan27 on January 5th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Do you think they should reopen the files on the JFK assassination? Why or why not?
by Freedom00 on September 10th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Do you think future technological advances will put any John F. Kennedy's assassination mysteries to rest?
Comments