| The last question was answered in just | 59 | seconds Let our thousands of members help! |
Welcome to Answerbag, a community of people sharing what they know. Top Answer out of 24 by wfbrad on Dec 15, 2005 at 4:39 am Permalink
Comments
show all comments
2 Samuel 12:7-8 "And Nathan said to David, Thou art the man. Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, I anointed thee king over Israel, and I delivered thee out of the hand of Saul; And I gave thee thy master s house, and thy master s wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things." This is the beginning of Nathan's condemnation of David for his affair with Bathsheba. Note however, that God states that He gave David his wives (plural). This is not God simply tolerating the practice. This is God taking an active part in giving David multiple wives. Furthermore, God says that He would have given David more if he had but asked. So, at certain times, God did more than just tolerated bigamy. At times He actually condoned it.
Read the passage again and in context. It is all about Natham exposing David's stealing of Uriah's wife Bathsheba for which He is under God's judgement. You can hardly say that God is condoning on one hand and judging on the other! There is a simple explanation in the simple reading of the text (try a version that is not in Elizabethan English, that might help) It is clear that God is reminding David that he victoriousl gave to him Saul's kingdom, his household and his responsibilities to care for.
wfbrad I fully agree with your exposition of the Genesis passage concerning marriage and I believe that this creation order is for all men for all time. Well done.
Someone else bumped up this question, so I don't feel bad for commenting on this old answer.
David received his wives from God, but was condemned for stealing another man's wife, then having that man killed. Answer 2 out of 24 by Thom64 on Dec 13, 2005 at 11:59 am Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Answer 3 out of 24 by Farino on Dec 13, 2005 at 11:13 am Permalink
Comments
show all comments
No ban on a (Christian/NT) deacon going near a dead body, that was a Temple Law, from the OT which put one in ritual impurity; those who served could not approach a corpse, see the Man found mugged and robbed on the road to Jericho, the (Temple) priest and levite passed by because they could not do their duty. The Samaritan took care of the injured man, paid for his medical help- moral of the story love of neighbor outweighs ritual regulation!
The man was not dead, so they were able to approach him. It was not a matter of ritual vs. love, but love for all men from all nations, hence the mans identity as a Samaritan was of import. The nation of Israel was to be a tribe of Kings and Priests, with whom for subjects? Was their generosity to be given only to their friends? What they were given free, were they to lord it over those of the nations, and hold them in contempt for not being so fortunate as to receive a free gift as they had? Nice reasoning though, I'd never thought of that approach, but the fact that he was not dead precludes that possibility.
Another question to consider is where in scripture does God condone plural marriage. God demonstrated His intent in marriage when He instituted the first marriage (Adam & Eve). As for marriage to one wife consider this passage from Ephesians 5:31 "For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh." Note that the "two" become "one flesh" not the three or four etc.
Answer 4 out of 24 by idne on May 1, 2007 at 12:44 pm Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Answer 5 out of 24 by researcher for God on May 1, 2007 at 12:28 pm Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Answer 6 out of 24 by borasalama on Jun 27, 2007 at 6:00 pm Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Answer 7 out of 24 by BiBiRaRi on Jun 25, 2007 at 11:52 pm Permalink
Comments
Good questions.
Um, Jesus also said that there are no marriages in Heaven, a concept which invalidates the Mormon concept of the third level (the best level) of the "Celestial Kingdom" being occupied entirely by married people and their kids.
. In fact if we get right down to it, Revelations stipulates that the 144,000 Saved are unmarried men. The "forbidding of marriage" thus is a good thing, not a bad thing. . The mainstream Church of Latter Day Saints "Doctrine & Covenants" doesn't actually forbid polygamy (Section 132 was never amended), they just have an announcement in the appendix that until the U.S. legalizes polygamy, no Mormon is to enter into a polygamous marriage. Note that I'm talking about the mainstream LDS community, not the "Fundamentalist LDS" communities such as Warren Jeffs' compounds. Answer 8 out of 24 by barjacob on Dec 19, 2006 at 2:39 pm Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Answer 9 out of 24 by Ethernium on Nov 4, 2006 at 6:42 am Permalink
Comments
When there was a disagreement among the apostles and scribes regarding circumcision, did they not reason from the scriptures to ascertain just what was required? Do you condemn the apostles for seeking clarification, or Jesus, when he commands us to take in accurate knowledge, or the bibles advice to keep testing oursleves out (testing our beliefs to ensure they are in accord with Bible principals) Are you not seating yourself in judgement of those asking and answering questions here? they are not adding to the word, they are studying it. They are asking what the Bible says, so don't be too quick to condemn people for good motives.
Answer 10 out of 24 by Stu B in white tie and tailCOAT on Jan 1, 2009 at 5:58 pm Permalink
Comments
(be the first to comment)
Add an Answer Many of the Biblical patriarchs had multiple wives. Does the Bible specifically forbid polygamy? How to write a good answerYour answer:
Important: Answerbag cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers submitted by members, and we recommend that you use common sense when following any advice found here. Read full disclaimer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

