by Sheepingly needs no handy men only hugs on August 19th, 2007

Sheepingly needs no handy men only hugs

Question

Help answer this question below.

Since all science is inductive (based on limited observation of patterns), to what extent does science prove anything? Are all scientific conclusions ultimately reducible to theoretical speculation? If so, how can we ever speak of causes in nature?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 4 helpful answers below.

  • by Glenn Blaylock on August 19th, 2007

    Glenn Blaylock

    See my answer to this question (http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/16188). If you don't want a religious discussion, then skip the second paragraph.

    • Like
    • Report

    1 comment | Post one | Permalink

  • by Just another bagger on August 19th, 2007

    Just another bagger

    I know...! Its a real bummer isnt it!

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by ChaiCustard on August 19th, 2007

    ChaiCustard

    I prefer to think of the science we experience, as being the human approximation of this perfect theoretical, induction based science you speak of.
    Since we all realize its not perfect, then the language we use when expressing it doesnt really matter. (Goal of science is to progress knowledge, not be 'perfectly-defined').
    In this case, the terms 'proof' and 'cause' arent absolutes, but concepts we aim to meet.
    (BTW - this might be better in philosophy?)

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by xprofessor on August 11th, 2011

    xprofessor

    "All science is inductive."
    Not so. The scientific method combines physical observation with DEDUCTIVE reasoning, allowing facts and laws to be established with high levels of confidence ("proof"). The INDUCTIVE part comes into play when formulating new hypotheses, i.e., making educated guesses about the outcomes of future observations, based on what's already known. Then the cycle starts all over again, and knowledge of the world is built and fitted together piece by piece...

    Don't confuse the scientific meaning of "theory" (systematic rules to account for many observations) with the everyday meaning of theory as "unproven speculation." The theory of gravitation, for example, is also a fact.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Since all science is inductive (based on limited observation of patterns), to what extent does science prove anything? Are all scientific conclusions ultimately reducible to theoretical speculation? If so, how can we ever speak of causes in nature?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Do 50year olds need more sleep