Very different indeed. One thing most of you are ignoring is what would happen to the Aztecs or the Inca (hate to break it to you, but the Maya collapsed about 100-200 years before Spanish conquest). Most archaeologists agree that neither civilization had reached the height of its power, so by the time Someone did discover the Americas, the two would be far more advanced, and possibly be able to repel colonization attempts. European Powers would probably refrain from sending another voyage, for either Columbus never found anything, therefore disuading Europeans from seeing any proffit in a voyage, or he never came back and they would dub the voyage too dangerous, or at least too costly to waste more ships on. China at this time was in a period of isolationism, and Middle Eastern countries had no reason to expand, as they already controled Asian trade Routes to Europe. Likely, the Americas would not be discovered until the creation of steam powered ships, which may occur later due to the absence of American inventors (of course, blood lines would be confined to Europe). As for history in Europe. Everything would be about the same until the time after the late 18th century. Without an American revolution, there would be no French Revolution; no Napoleon; no Franco-Prussian War, no French vs. German hostilities; no WWI; no WWII. The Spanish, French, British, and Dutch Empires would not have entered such periods of imperialism, and Asia would remain free from European hands, instead left to Muslim expansionism as was seen in India in the 1600s. The highly organized Inca Empire was at the time extending rights and privelages to the common man, showing a path towards a militaristic Democratic Socialism, while the far more loosely bound Aztec Alliance was doing the opposite (though Montezuma, being without a biological heir, may have ended up ceding the throne to a more benevolent and justice minded ruler). Due to the Inca's higher level of organization and integration of its subjects, any war between the Aztec and the Inca would have resulted in favor of the Inca. Free of the confining Andes and with their mastery of ruling various different environments and peoples, there would have been little in the way of obstacles to stop Tahuantinsuyu (the actual name for the Inca Empire) from conquering all of the civilizations of Mesoamerica and colonizing the cityless Eastern South America and North America (Anasazi and their cities are collapsed too). Due to the Inca's cultural tolerance and advanced food and supply distribution system system for its subjects, most conquest would have been peaceful. Because of social integration, a well supplied standign army, and 350 years to advance befor the possibility of discovery by Old World powers, Tahuantinsuyu would require a full scale coalition invasion to overthrow, and likely European colinization would be restricted to unclaimed areas in Northern North America. So the U.S. might still exist, just at a later date, on a smaller scale (unless it aquires land from Tahuantinsuyu as it did from France and Mexico), it might be of a different lineage (from France, Holland, or Spain instead of Britain), and would be the United States of Something else, because Amerigo Vaspucci would never have had a chance to prove lands that were not known were continents. Finally, depending on its advancement in its yeaars of isolation and its modernization once discovered by Europe (once again, the Ottoman have Asia to get rich off of, and Asia is either weak, isolated, or under Muslim control), Tahuantinsuyu might become a world superpower.
Comments
good one
by giveiturall on June 22nd, 2007
i think theyde all be different
by wolfwarrior1996 on March 22nd, 2010