There are many reasons, like the only real evidence being that "I saw it on TV". It would, and would still be, far easier and cheaper to fake it than to make it. It was the height of the cold war and the US couldn't afford politically, to lose the moon race as the Soviets had won the race for the first man in space. If we could do it almost 40 years ago, why haven't we went back yet? I personally have seen all the documentaries about it and am still totally undecided. For greater in depth information, check this out: http://batesmotel.8m.com/ There is also another ridiculing the conspiracy theorists: http://www.stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm Thanks for the feed back guys. I think we should question history, as it is only a VERSION of history preached to us by the people who have the most to gain from that particular version. That has always been true, no matter what the time or place. So if it doesn't sound or feel right, there's probably something fishy about it. That's not to say the moon landings were faked, just that we should question the writers of history to prove their version happened. Incidentally, there IS a big voice from the old USSR that never believed the moon landings, it just doesn't translate very well to the average BBC or CNN audience.

Van Allen radiation. Unless the suits were made of lead and the exposure time was limited.

The Ratiation in space between the earth and moon is very strong and would kill a person very quicky,the wall of the space craft would have to be made of lead about 1 meter think (it wasn't)to survive. The soviets scraped there moon landing project and still have not plans on traveling to the moom for this reason.

I don't believe that we have landed on Moon. I have researched on all the points that the non-believers have put forward, and feel if not all, most are true. Again, if we have landed on moon once; why not go there again?

We could have fooled everone - but it still would of been easier and cheaper to just land on the moon. Rocket science really ain't that complicated. It is possible that we have been faking the moon this whole time though. If that is the case - then the fake landing is justified.

There were definitely some valid questions asked in that video and there did seem to be some very studio-like footage. I think there was a landing but for some reason, like national security ??? or some other reason, the real images were not broadcast??? I also feel that it is .... 'odd' that the original footage has now been 'lost'!! "But just 37 years after Apollo 11, it is feared the magnetic tapes that recorded the first moon walk - beamed to the world via three tracking stations, including Parkes's famous "Dish" - have gone missing at NASA's Goddard Space Centre in Maryland." Quote from - http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/one-giant-blunder-for-mankind-how-nasa-lost-moon-pictures/2006/08/04/1154198328978.html

Because they don't understand concepts like: vacuums, uneven surfaces, camera exposure time, how easy it really is to send a rocket to the moon, and the fact that Russia also has scientists who would figure out and publicly announce that the moon landings were fake, if they were.

Because lots of people love conspiracies!,like: Elvis is Alive, JFK was killed by __________ (lots of suspects, but not by Oswald), The Pentagon was hit by __________ (who knows, but not by the hijacked airplane), plus many more! It sparks the imagination, we just love it!

Well I will be 75 in a month and I watched it on TV. Didn't believe it then and don't believe it now.Oh yes, they lost a tape of that much importance.......hummmmmm must be with a certain 'birth certificate', I see the pictures now and they aren't anything like the originals. The government always thinks they can fool the people. Like I say "Beware of the Muslim bearing gifts" like our health insurance. WOW maybe they will lose those papers too. Or maybe yet they also are with the UFOs the government has in Dayton.