bolilla -- Here's the thing: NOBODY is all one way or all another way. We're all a mixture of many different things.
We commonly fail to recognize this, and we tend to think of people as being consistently one way or another. It seems like common sense: "he's a jerk!", or "she's a saint"... we really think we can "sum people up" in some short phrase.
Ironically, we really don't like it when somebody else tries to sum US up in a simple phrase -- even if it's good. Think about it: even if someone says "you're always a wonderful person", when you stop to reflect a bit, you might notice that this puts you in a bit of a bind: if you want to avoid disappointing that person, you now have to be wonderful ALL the time... even when you're in a bad mood, or confused, or angry. That sets the bar pretty high. When someone takes a compliment like that too seriously, it can actually become a kind of prison which keeps them forever chasing an ideal image of who they should be. It gives no freedom.
Why do we do this to each other? Why do we try to "summarize" who another person is and then hang on to that summary permanently? It's a combination of habit and lack of understanding, really: on the one hand, we're simply conditioned to think that way. Everybody around us seems to think that way -- we hear others talk about each other and themselves as if they could be summarized in a simple concept -- "he's such an ass!". If you grow up your entire life listening to people make these short, simplistic statements on a regular basis, it's understandable that you'd think this constitutes a legitimate way to think about other people.
On the other hand, we have a predisposition to oversimplify EVERYTHING we encounter in life: we like to turn our life into a bunch of concepts.... little nuggets of thought that we can pick up and put in our pockets and carry around with us -- simple ideas which reduce the nagging anxiety that life is disturbingly complicated. These simplistic concepts come in a lot of different forms: aphorisms, "street wisdom", cliches, etc. "Life is a journey, not a destination". "The truth shall set you free". "Believe in your dreams and you can be anything". The list is endless.
So I'm saying that we're addicted to our concepts -- oversimplified ideas about who we are, who others are, and what life is. This addiction is driven by our anxiety about how complex and ever-changing life REALLY is -- in our effort to get away from that anxiety and feel some sort of peace, we cling to these notions and we don't challenge them.
So getting back to your question: "can you keep your faith that someone you loved was a good person despite (...) whatever horrible thing they did?" If you listen to the question in light of this discussion about clinging to concepts, can you see that it comes from exactly that perspective? That is, you have an idea that this person was "a good person", and you want to hang on to that idea. But you can't reconcile it with something terrible they did, and that's causing anxiety.
The key to resolving this is to recognize that your attempt to hang on to this simplistic image of them is a fundamental kind of error that everyone makes. If you can let go of that way of thinking, and just allow for that ALL of us are very complicated (including your friend -- a former boyfriend I presume?), the problem which prompted the question will simply disappear.
However, the disappearance of that problem will be accompanied by the appearance of a much larger problem -- this business about life being very complicated and things changing all the time! That problem is not going away, no matter how hard we try to simplify things and cling to our philosophies or views. So the choice for us poor humans is simple: learn to tolerate the complexity and changeability in life, or hide our heads in oversimplifications. Personally, I favor the former... but we all make our own choices moment by moment, and this is one of the big ones.
Comments
Great answer, SB
by Jodie44 on May 4th, 2007
Nefariously superb!
by Carmella on May 4th, 2007
Wow, thanks. I don't think I've been nefarious for quite some time.
by Stableboy on May 4th, 2007
Well actually, you take complete credit for introducing me to that word around 24 hours ago. I drove everyone crazy with it today. That and 'verbose' :)
by Carmella on May 4th, 2007
I think overanalyzing is more likely my problem. You hit the nail on the head with the anxiety that comes with trying to reconcile these two 'concepts'. I don't feel like I ever pigeonhole people. I understand that we're both good and bad; I just want so much to believe in 'essentially good'. If there was a little bad thing, it would be easily reconcile to this 'essentially good' person ... but sprinkle it Catholicism and vast cultural differences, and I'm really confused. Once someone confesses a huge lie to you ... how do you not think everything that they ever said/did was a lie? Thanks for your answer +
by bolilla on May 7th, 2007
Well I think the other issue your comment brings up is trust: when you find out about a lie like that (cheating?) it undermines your own trust in your own judgment... you trusted this person, and now you find your trust was misplaced. So a lot of the anxiety is actually self-doubt: "can I trust my own judgment?" "am I just a gullible fool?". Discovering the lie shakes your self-confidence. So that mixes in with everything else we're talking about here and makes it even more complicated. But still, the best thing to do is just work at being aware of all that stuff, and take life one moment at a time.
by Stableboy on May 7th, 2007
just to clarify, it wasn't cheating (at least I hope that didn't happen ... :)) ... my friends all think I'm gullible, I guess. I finally understand that tenet "love is blind" ... ... maybe these zingers exist for a reason? More than reducing anxiety, it makes us connect to others ... it's human, we're human, and it makes us realize that others have 'been there' before us.
by bolilla on May 7th, 2007