by Want To Sleep With A Miner on July 29th, 2011

Question

Help answer this question below.

Should they have sterilized Casey Anthony, just in case?

Like
Report

Share:: Facebook; Twitter; Other

Answers. 7 helpful answers below.

by ChuckExAnon on July 29th, 2011
It might have been better if they would have sterilized her parents...years and years ago.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Timjon on July 29th, 2011
Don't be foolish.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by KDP on July 29th, 2011
She probably knows that if she finds herself in the same situation again of having a missing kid that no one will believe her story. So, unless she is ultra dumb...
Comments
- Depends on if she is rational and strong enough to resist her urges. If she is, she would be able to not do it again. However, many killers are so strongly compelled to kill that they, literally, cannot resist.
  
  Report
  
  by Arisztid on July 29th, 2011
- Yes, agreed.
  
  Report
  
  by KDP on July 29th, 2011
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
2 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Athrael on July 29th, 2011
In case of what?

She was found 'not guilty'. We thus have to presume 'innocence'.

This assumption of innocence means we cannot do what we want with her.

If we 'sterilize' her 'just in case' this readily means that the State can sterilize anyone 'just in case'.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by knowwereman222 on July 29th, 2011
Casey Anthony may or may not kill her child. The jury found her innocent and as a result she free. That's where it ends
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by rockycitro on July 29th, 2011
lol maybe they can put casey and her parents altogether in one cell for 20 years...

http://www.funnyvideosviral.com/2011/07/11casey-anthony-killed-cartoon-spoof/
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by buxtonite ..slowly losing my mind on July 29th, 2011
How about giving the prosecutors a lobotomy for going into a case half cocked and with evidence that sucked in the first place. Any jury would come up with the same chice with the so called facts that were presented to them.. remember its the job of the prosecutors to convince a jury of the guilt of a person and they didn't .. same as in the OJ case.. they f*cked up big time so the blame sits right in their laps.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink