by killdrphil - reasonable for a madman on November 14th, 2010

killdrphil - reasonable for a madman

Question

Help answer this question below.

Is it more realistic to try to contain Al-Qaeda rather than to try to stop them altogether?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 6 helpful answers below.

  • by RosieGHM Jetpacker on November 14th, 2010

    RosieGHM Jetpacker

    We made them what they are today KDP. I have no idea what we can do to put the toothpaste back into the tube. I'm thinking nothing at all. We just ride the tide we created and hold on for dear life. Meanwhile our guys/gals keep dying. What a wonderful thing left as legacy by a certain president who still maintains he has nothing at all for which to apologize. :(

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by BLUE LOTUS 935618 on December 5th, 2010

    BLUE LOTUS 935618

    yeah. i think it would be easier.
    if only the UN would do something about them. this war... if they win and i'm not saying it will ever happen. but if they get a hold of a big place and have resources and reproduce... can turn into WWIII.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Twisted Taco on November 27th, 2010

    Twisted Taco

    Boy, how's that Al Qaeda business for Karma? The CIA created Al Qaeda who took a life of their own and now they can't be contained. ha ha! Gotta give it to Amerikans for not being very smart. If it weren't for those big guns, y'all be in your own giant asylum.

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Shunyata on November 14th, 2010

    Shunyata

    maybe.
    I think either way isn't going to resolve the problem.
    you may think I am crazy.
    IMo the only way to stop this increasing daily terror is :
    Obama has to ask all to the table.
    we have to shut up and let them talk it all out. let them say all the things that make them act this violently.
    we need to start hearing the beef many people in the world have against the USA and change our path.
    I know hardly anyone agrees with this.
    I think though at this point " listening to grievances is the only way".

    • Like
    • Report

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by kree66 on November 14th, 2010

    kree66

    no, we can not contain them anymore than we can stop them altogether.
    here is an example.....something happens to the one in charge, the next in charge steps up and so on and so on.

    @RosieGHM Jetpacker blaming a president for our troops dying is absurd if we didnt do something he would have been ridiculed for that, he does something and he is condemned for that a bit of a catch 22 wouldnt you say? and for us to go in get osama and leave is fairy tale hollywood bs. it doesnt work that way. our military does more than you may think, we go into a situation and along with battling we train forces to be able to fend for themselves. yes we trained osama we did this in the 80's when russia was our enemy and we went to afghanistan to help. it is just a risk that we take when we are fighting for freedom and democracy around the globe

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Moongrim on November 15th, 2010

    Moongrim

    The tighter your grip the more systems will fall away...

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading Is it more realistic to try to contain Al-Qaeda rather than to try to stop them altogether?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads