- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
I think that Focus on the Family played their hand brilliantly. They put out only that they were making an ad featuring Tim Tebow and his mother and Planned Parenthood and all the others filled in the blanks with the backstory and filmed their rebuttals having never seen the ad. Their rebuttals actually played before the Tebow as was even seen. After the actual ad played, all the rebuttals looked pretty silly, and I think the National Organization for Women was trying to salvage the situation. However, the damage was already done and their comments only make them look sillier.
I think the chairwoman of NOW is just looking for something to argue about and like to hate on the Tebow's because of their message. It's comedy people. Was the Doritos commercial with the shock collar glorifying violence against men? Was the snickers commercial glorifying violence against old people?
LOL!!! do these people have anything else better to do??? like the fact that there are women being abused!!!
What is NOW? What is Tebow? What country is this in?
She needs a life.
Where will we be without the nicest people in this world, mothers?
by HoboJoe on December 13th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Is it okay if I ask if a store is still open or not like this: is the store still exist or already closed..?
by mrc on December 19th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Is Being Intelligent Often Confused With Being Knowledgeable?
by mdGreg on January 1st, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Is the health of a society dependent upon the health of its members? Is mental health or physical health more important or does it matter?
by RosieGHM Jetpacker on December 31st, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Would someone please explain to me people's recent obsession with the color blue?
by Random on January 14th, 2012
| 2 people like this
You're reading The chairman, er..I mean chairwoman, of NOW thinks the Tebow commercial was glorifying violence against woman, Is that the way You saw it??
Comments