- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
The Mexico/USA border would be located in a different place; the Mexicans would still be trying to illegally cross it.
It would be of a size comparable to the USA. What are now the southwestern states would be considerably less populated and would have a GDP per capita about one-fourth what it is today.
Ulysses Grant once called the war with Mexico one of the "most unjust wars in our history", yet there was a series of rebellions within Mexico contemporary with the one by which Texas became independent some years before. Many Mexicans who ended up on the USA side were happy that way.
http://www.lone-star.net/mall/texasinfo/mexicow.htm
They would've had even more land to mismanage, a whole bunch more Apache indians to fight, and a much larger border to export their migrants workers across.
Much larger. It would have the entire Southwest including Texas and California. This is the only thing I'm sure of. There would probably be more Native Americans around since they didn't typically go out of their way to annihilate them. However those who didn't assimilate and tried to maintain sovereignty over their native lands would probably be deemed terrorists like in South America.
What does a map drawn to scale mean?
by Answerbag Staff on January 9th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What Is a Verbal Scale?
by Answerbag Staff on January 9th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Who made topography?
by Answerbag Staff on January 9th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Why is it when Americans talk about Canada they seem to have a dumb smirk on there face or think there better? Something funny about Canada?
by Buck Swazy on January 27th, 2012
| 3 people like this
Why is it that 1/5 of Americans can't locate the U.S on a world map ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww
by Buck Swazy on January 27th, 2012
| 6 people like this
You're reading What would mexico been like with the land it had before the mexican-american war?
Comments