- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
There's really nothing biologically wrong with it. The genetic breakdowns occur when multiple generations of blood begin to mix. One kid, though s/he may have some social issues with a family like that, is only at a slightly higher risk of genetic abnormalities. Then again, I'm the choir singing back to the preacher, so let an opponent answer.
Objectively, there is nothing wrong, and morally, I can't see it either.
Think, how often would STDs be spread? If parents showed their kids the way to do it, instead of having them find their own way. I would far prefer to be taught how to go about it than to try and figure out with someone who is in, most respects, a total stranger.
Nothing.
Incest is not wrong when it is between consenting adults who are responsible enough to take the proper precautions to prevent pregnancy.
There is nothing wrong with it at all.
Do you think incest is "bad" if your family member youre fucking is under 18? I have & don't think it is!
by Gothcutie on February 2nd, 2012
| 1 person likes this
How do i get my 87 yr old grandmother to have sex with me???
by kinky perverted man on January 27th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
How do I get my straight dad who hates bi/gay people to have sex with me?
by bisexualkota14 on February 2nd, 2012
| 1 person likes this
Is anyone else really turned on right now?
by Ytrehafj12 on January 26th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
I think i am in love with my mom, what should i do about this?
by HHFisher1983 on January 26th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading People who think incest is immoral always point to the reproductive results. What about when the participants use protection, or they only perform non-intercourse acts? What is objectively wrong with that?
Comments