by cookie on November 21st, 2009

cookie

Question

Help answer this question below.

How do you think someone should be rewarded for their job performance? and should it be based on senority, merit, or cost of living.

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 2 helpful answers below.

  • by dumdum on November 21st, 2009

    dumdum

    Merit first, maybe a little for senority, if cost of living is a factor that should have been knowh at the hire on date and apply to all in the area. The thing wrong with merit pay is it can be so subjective -who's making the call on this, are they sane, do they know their job, let alone what you do? Senority can be farce - a person could be around for 100 years and still not know how to run a copy machine. However it is done who decides has to be be at least not crazy and care to try to be fair - good luck. +5

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

  • by Pirastic on November 21st, 2009

    Pirastic

    I think it should be based on merit because you should get paid for what you do at the job, not just because you have been there the longest.

    No comments. Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

You're reading How do you think someone should be rewarded for their job performance? and should it be based on senority, merit, or cost of living.

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Performance should be rewarded
Ex friend as boss
How do you think someone should be rewarded for their performance
How do you think someone should be rewarded for their job performance