by Civic Cat on November 19th, 2009

Civic Cat

Question

Help answer this question below.

"Highway of Heroes"? Wouldn't it be more accurate to refer to it as Highway of Gurkhas"?

  • Like
  • Report

Answers. 2 helpful answers below.

  • by MacNeilD on November 21st, 2009

    MacNeilD

    No. The term _Gurkha_ refers to a very specific contingent of infantrymen that never came from Canada; let me tell you something about the history of the Gurkha.

    _Gurkha_ (as we know it today) came originally from a kingdom in what today is western Nepal, called _Gorkha_. During the 1700's, the kingdom of Gorkha steadily grew in size and power as it recruited formidable soldiers from many ethnic groups in the area that had their own strong military traditions. In 1763, the first Gurkha regiment was created; during the first years of the 19th century, the kingdom benefited from an able prime minister who expanded and strengthened the national army.

    In the fullness of time, Gurkha forces encountered troops under the authority of the British East India Company. Skirmishes led to the Anglo-Nepali War, which lasted from 1814 to 1816. The British may have won on the battlefields, but Gurkha prisoners of war won the respect of even their captors. One happy result of this war for the United Kingdom was that Gurkha soldiers could be recruited by the British army as well as its Nepalese counterpart.

    Over the next two centuries, the Gurkha gained renown in the service of the United Kingdom as a brigade of loyal, skillful, adaptable and valiant infantrymen who could and did fight anywhere and everywhere. After India gained its independence from the United Kingdom, its army was allowed to join the British one in recruiting Gurkha soldiers. A regiment of Gurkha, to this day, can probably beat any regiment of Canadian infantry--any regiment of infantry period.

    www.suite101.com/article.cfm/oriental_history/86225

    • Like
    • Report

    6 comments | Post one | Permalink

  • by MacNeilD on November 23rd, 2009

    MacNeilD

    Am I allowed a second answer to this question?

    Here's an elaboration of my first answer, then:

    Although we cannot use the term _Gurkha_
    to describe the way Canadian soldiers are
    used in Afghanistan, there is a term we
    _can_ use to describe the relationship between
    Canadian soldiers operating in Afghanistan
    and the American administration who is their
    _de facto_ employer: that term is _Hessians_.

    The term _Hessians_ goes back to the American
    War of Independence. Conscripted soldiers
    from the district of Hesse, in what today is
    Germany, served as auxiliary troops commanded by their own officers under the ultimate authority of the King of England. To this day, bodies of soldiers employed by a government other than that of their homeland can still be called _Hessians_.

    Mercenaries differ from Hessians because _mercenaries are not organized in units larger than a company_ and fight for anyone who pays them. On the other hand, Hessians are _battalions and regiments of soldiers_ who fight in the _service of a national government other than their own_. Indeed, the Gurkha of today are used as Hessians by the governments of India and the United Kingdom.

    If you wish, Civic Cat, you can rename the_Highway of Heroes_ as the _Highway of Slain Hessians_.

    • Like
    • Report

    2 comments | Post one | Permalink

Want to attach an image to your answer? Click here.

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

You're reading "Highway of Heroes"? Wouldn't it be more accurate to refer to it as Highway of Gurkhas"?

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads