- NEW!
by Anonymous on November 18th, 2009
It's what people STILL call "lies."
+5
by MrJosh on November 18th, 2009
Yeah, but McCain and Palin might still be of some political use to eachother so "fabrications" is a little easier to deny or dismiss in the next election cycle.
(Edited for spelling)
by dave on November 21st, 2009
Yeah, it's the politically correct translation.
by Moongrim on November 19th, 2009
Most folks call lies, yes.
It's what Fux news calls "fair and balanced".
by Stranger in a Strange Land on November 21st, 2009
Yes. He committed political hara-kiri by agreeing to her nomination. Should have gone with his gut instinct and asked Joe Lieberman. Let the right-wing howl, they had nowhere else to go. +4
by my2cents--Vote for Paul on November 19th, 2009
What in particular are these "fabrications"?
That McCain advisors did not like it when Palin did not do exactly as she was told. We know this is true as it was the McCain advisors that were whining about it during the campaign.
Do you have Sarah Palin streak for you?
by Andy B has left AB on October 11th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Would you say that Sarah Palin is the Kim Kardashian of the political world?
by Anonymous on October 10th, 2011
| 5 people like this
Do you have a Sarah Palin streak in you?
by WABOO on October 11th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Sarah Palin threw guests out of her house because they were using baby oil in their bedroom? Is that worth ruining a friendship? Baby oil?
by GibsonGuy on October 4th, 2011
| 6 people like this
had a laugh yet today? late night show host says,"Sarah Palin says, would love to be the Pres but couldn't handle the 2 year commitment"
by Baba on October 9th, 2011
| 6 people like this
You're reading Palin book based on "fabrications" according to McCain's former advisor Nicole Wallace. Is that what people used to call lies?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
Yep.
by tuvw on November 18th, 2009
Thanks for the points, my friend.
by Anonymous on November 18th, 2009
You're welcome. :o)
by tuvw on November 18th, 2009
Thinking you are correct except it always seems like it is the clown in the other party. If it is one of their own {of either party} there seems to be a contest to avoid the the word. Thanks +6
by dumdum on November 18th, 2009