- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
no
they attacked military targets, no civilian
They were not "terrorists" but simply misguided and used patriots.
To us it was stupid what they did - but to the Japanese they are hero's - and rightly so.
I honor their memory while being apalled at their deeds and those who used them for their own ends.
No.
They were a highly trained resource used like chewing gum by a country desperate to avoid losing.
What do you think of the iPhone that instead of giving directions for abortion clinics send users to religious pregnancy crisis centres?
by Ombliss22 on December 3rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
So the guy in Massachusetts decided.....
by Epistaxis on September 29th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What is the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter?
by mikedsign on December 3rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What is the difference between a terrorist and an enemy combatant?
by mikedsign on December 3rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
It's not enough just to be alleged to be a terrorist That's part of what due process is deciding are you a terrorist? Agree/disagree Why
by Wynper on December 5th, 2011
| 2 people like this
You're reading Were Japanese kamikaze pilots terrorists and why or why not?
Comments