- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Name calling does not fit any rules. It is just a very poor way of letting off steam.
Even though douchebags are generally assumed to be less than considerate I believe that the use of the adjective points up a particular aspect of the douchebag in question and helps the listener get a better sense of what to expect of the specific douchebag mentioned.
No, just a bit excessive.
depends on the person it is directed at.
It is the socially enept dealing with a severe vocabulary deficit. +5
I think it works.
I've been called worse by my wife.
sounds childish and unintelligent; its a response you would expect to hear from a methhead
They don't really fit together. Better an inconsiderate ass or leaking douchebag.
It is only fitting if the accolade of "douchebag" needs emphasis. Mostly, I would try to avoid name calling because the most imaginative wins and may not necessarily be the right one to win.
+6 for being considerate enough to ask if douchebag is enough, not many people do.
Seems to me that hurling such an insult is exactly what a douchebag might be expected to do, and is extremely inconsiderate. So like so many ad hominem attacks, it probably applies well to the person launching the attack. Whether is aptly describes the person it is aimed it is a separate matter. :)
where did the term speaking off the top of you head come from.
by rabid on January 23rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What does the idiom 'it takes 2 to tango' mean to you?
by Owl 5 - 5 on May 20th, 2009
| 2 people like this
Where did the express "I'm just saying" originate?
by bomberpete on May 23rd, 2009
| 3 people like this
When was the expression "I was born at night, but not last night" first heard or written?
by gwbram on May 12th, 2009
| 1 person likes this
In what situations would you say the following phrase? : “I’ll do you one better!”
by Running, Fall Up on February 10th, 2009
| 2 people like this
You're reading Is calling someone an "inconsiderate douchebag" fitting or redundant?
Comments