- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
It has always been about the money, as long as you can buy, sell, or trade war and peace as long as they have a price economics will always be the main and only factor in public policy, all things in public policy boil down to 2 factors polarized to the max and the fight begins and end economically whoever will pay for it and this is why the rape of nations and natural resources continues to provide economy to these two polarized situations and there is no middle ground there never was, it was never intended this way but as long as the religious insanities of polarized situations(good and evil / saints and demons) continues public policy will always be about the money it is a polarized control generally created to steal from one and to give to others generally who do not belong where they are at in the first place and the rape of nations and peoples continues because it is economically beneficial for it to continue as it has for far too long and with a $29.2 trillion dollar debt I don't see it getting better anytime soon just continued invasion and rapes ..
~Nemo~
What is the leading sugar cane growing country?
by Answerbag Staff on April 27th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
What happened to the English language? Could the use of more and more slag by our youth contribute to the downgraded economy of today?
by carmenator8 on December 6th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Are U.S salaries too high only as much as U.S CEOs and top execs are in comparison to the rest of the world?
by -O-uknow on November 19th, 2011
| 2 people like this
How to solve this microeconomics problem?
by Anonymous on December 29th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Can anyone find online sources offering conclusive proof of tax cuts increasing tax revenue?
by apex01 on December 15th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading How important is economics in deciding public policy?
Comments