What do you think of Interlingua?

Es vero! - Multe gratias! :)

• Report

by enermazing on November 1st, 2009

Thank you for your answer+
I had the same experience (German), and I'm surprised that so few people know about it, leave alone use it

• Report

by enermazing on November 1st, 2009

deutsche? stimmt das? also, du bist deutsche aber du wohnst in griechenland? sprichst du auch griechisch? wie viele sprachen sprichst du denn?

• Report

by Don Quixote el Manchego on November 4th, 2009

ja, ich bin deutsche und lebe seit 10 jahren in griechenland. ich spreche deutsch, englisch und griechisch (nur "neu") und wenn's sein muss auch franzoesisch. Ueber Interlingua bin ich vor einem halben Jahr gestolpert, und war fasziniert, dass ich ungefaehr 2 wochen gebraucht habe bis ich so ziemlich jeden text in interlingua verstehen konnte. Vor zwei Jahren habe ich mit Sanskrit herumprobiert: weil ich die Schriftzeichen schoen finde :), aber in erster linie weil ich vor hatte, griechisch fuer englischsprachige auslaender zu unterrichten und feststellen wollte, wo genau die probleme sind beim erlernen einer sprache a) mit fremden schriftzeichen b) mit einer grammatik die mehr strukturiert ist als die eigene. ich bekam ein paar sehr interessante einsichten, habe aber dann aufgegeben, aus zeitmangel :)

• Report

by enermazing on November 4th, 2009

ps: dein deutsch hoert sich "nativ" an, dein englisch auch (??) - da die "hauptverkehrssprache" in AB englisch ist, schlage ich vor, auf englisch umzusteigen

• Report

by enermazing on November 4th, 2009

It's a (semi-) artificial language based mostly on English, Italian, Spanish, French and Portuguese. If you are speaking one of these languages, and perhaps have some basic knowledge of a second, you can understand a text written in Interlingua fairly well, at least the gist of it.
If you are interested: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interlingua

• Report

by enermazing on October 30th, 2009

A new language? Sounds pretty cool.

• Report

by pouncey on October 31st, 2009

Actually it's not that new, it was developed in the 1950's.

• Report

by enermazing on October 31st, 2009

Well considered to all the other one its pretty new to me.

• Report

by pouncey on October 31st, 2009

:) that's true!

• Report

by enermazing on November 1st, 2009

Yes just by comparison.

• Report

by pouncey on November 1st, 2009

Why do you think it "sucks"?

• Report

by enermazing on November 4th, 2009

for me part of what makes a language interesting is the culture that goes with it. the music. the food (in whatever country it's spoken). the cute girls that you get to practice on. made-up languages--sign language included--there's none of that. for me it's a shell of an experience.

• Report

by Don Quixote el Manchego on November 4th, 2009

I'm sure you, as a linguist, know that a language (in any of its forms) and culture develop together, that language is part of and essential to culture. So maybe Interlingua is simply not old enough, or not spoken by enough people?

Apart from that, wouldn't a shared language help to develop a shared culture? Or, at least help people from different cultures to share their experiences, exchange opinions - and maybe find some common denominators?

• Report

by enermazing on November 4th, 2009

absolutely. all of those things are true and important. but for me there's something amazing about the history and organic development of language. tracing documents from charlemagne's time to see when french and german started diverge/emerge. looking at the 1400yr. old language of the qur'an and comparing it to an arabic news website. or even digging deep into old and middle english to better understand how modern english ticks. that thrills me. and amazes me.

exchange is great, but i'd rather see everyone speaking 3-4 languages each and be able to communicate ideas in the flavor of the moment as opposed to a frankenstein hodge-podge where no one has native jokes and the history of the constituent parts is muddled or unavailable.

• Report

by Don Quixote el Manchego on November 4th, 2009

re: history and organic development: that is one of the things i appreciate most about interlingua, that it is not as artificial as esperanto, but based on the roots (vocabulary & grammar) of a small, defined set of languages. it may be assembled, but it has a long history
- sorry, must stop, the owner of the computer just arrived ;)

• Report

by enermazing on November 4th, 2009

i'm back, for the moment - the computer is my husband's, plus i am sitting at his desk in order to use it ;)

what i want to add is this: it is not difficult to interest someone who knows 2 or 3 languages already in learning more. but it is very difficult to motivate someone to learn a second language, especially as many people had bad experiences in school, shut off when they hear the word "grammar", and in general believe they are just "not good at learning languages". interlingua has all the components and advantages that would make it an excellent, and quickly rewarding pre-course "how to learn a language" (for anglo/roman native speakers), and i'm surprised that this hasn't happened long since

• Report

by enermazing on November 4th, 2009