- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Who discovered the plum pudding model of the atom?
by Answerbag Staff on January 8th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Are electrons smaller than protons?
by Answerbag Staff on May 6th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Who discovered the proton in England in 1919?
by Answerbag Staff on July 1st, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Is it possible to break down a solid (at constant temperature) into a liquid?
by Anonymous on July 2nd, 2011
| 3 people like this
What volume in L of SO2 at STP can be produced by the burning of 1.00 g P4S3 in excess O2?
by Maciw95 on September 28th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Why are atoms spherical in shape? Why aren't they cube, pyramid, or any other shape?
Comments
Exactly. A better shape description of most atoms is most likely "lopsided, squishy clouds".
by lynnenorth on January 5th, 2006
I knew you were going to say that...But these are strictly mathematical functions and "theories". Truth be told we have know idea what the shapes of atoms are...only the statistical probabilities of what they MIGHT be according to Human mathemetics.The mathematics also says they can be any probable shape inside their wave functions...or outside.
by Outta-here on March 16th, 2009
Of all big theories, quantum electrodynamics is the most accurate. It is far more accurate than, say, the theory of gravity. If any theory could be described as a fact, the quantum theory of electrons can. Of course, gravity is only a theory. It could just be that the Earth sucks.
It doesn't make sense to say "they can be any probable shape inside their wave functions". The electrons act as point sources, and the "cloud" is a cloud of positions where the electron might be. It is not some subset shape inside this like a question mark, it really is that shape. Nor is there an "outside". The cloud for the inner most electron fills all space, but is densest at the center of the atom, and falls off exponentially.
by Quirkie on March 16th, 2009