Military customs and protocol
 
Question:
Avatar

Should you kill someone from a different country you are at war with, while you are in the Military because your superior ordered you to. Is it right?

By The Arcan Asked Oct 23 2009 2:01AM
22
Pts
 
 
Rate Question
Answer Question Help someone!
Get the latest questions in Military customs and protocol
flag

Welcome to Answerbag, a community of people sharing what they know.
Sign up now to ask a question or help someone else by giving an answer!

signup now
Sort answers by: Rating | DateArrow Down
 

Top Answer out of 8

by Anonymous on Oct 26, 2009 at 12:27 pm Permalink

Avatar
As long as your superiors order is lawful under the UCMJ and rules of war (Geneva and Hague Conventions, etc.). Generally speaking, a junior enlisted soldier would not be expected to know every detail of the legal requirements and if he or she obeyed an unlawful order, that should be taken into consideration and the superior held accountable.Hope this has been helpful. +5
14
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 2 out of 8

by downtide on Oct 23, 2009 at 2:20 am Permalink

Avatar
Yes. It's what you signed up to do when you joined the military.
13
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments show all comments Show More
Avatar Anonymous Oct, 28 2009 at 01:45 AM
Jadey ,if that is the case,I've never seen documentation. That doesn't mean that the policy doesn't exist, since my duties never involved prisoner interrogation. If it was official policy, then I would have to state that I was ashamed to wear the uniform of a nation that ordered such practices. I agree with you that such practices, when publicized, actually create more resistance to the military forces. I was taught that information obtained by torture is of little value, since a person under such treatment will tell the interrogator whatever he thinks the interrogator wants to hear.
Avatar Jadey - Vive la difference Oct, 28 2009 at 02:05 AM
Well exactly. This is what made me doubt the truth behind claims that it is policy. Why have a policy which is proven to be ineffective at best and counter productive at worst? If I remember rightly though, Gray said that it is mostly not done to extract information and intelligence at all. Saying that the US may torture one person to gain info which may protect national security is, he claims, a lie. He said that by allowing, and guiding, the public to debate whether torture is morally permissible in terms of intelligence acquisition, we are distracted from debating the real issue - is it right or wrong to torture at all? I don't want to believe that what he says is true. I would want that even less if I were American.
Avatar Anonymous Oct, 28 2009 at 02:29 AM
That's exactly correct,Jadey.

Answer 3 out of 8

by Jadey - Vive la difference on Oct 26, 2009 at 12:25 pm Permalink

Avatar
Unless that other person is a combatant (that includes members of armed groups which are not legitimate armies, but does not included wounded soldiers posing no threat or surrendered soldiers... plus a lot of other conditions, rules and laws relating to this that I won't go into here) it is illegal both for your superior to order you to kill him, and for you to do it under International Humanitarian Law.

If you would be tried for it, that you had been ordered to do so would be no excuse, and you would be found guilty of unlawful killing. However, that you were following orders may be considered in the sentence.
8
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments show all comments Show More
Avatar Anonymous Oct, 26 2009 at 12:58 PM
Unfortunately, in practice, some organization "scapegoat" the most junior soldier to cover for the unlawful order of a superior, Shouldn't happen but it does :-(
Avatar Anonymous Oct, 26 2009 at 12:58 PM
Keeping my fingers crossed for you!
Avatar Jadey - Vive la difference Oct, 26 2009 at 12:59 PM
That's a real shame, I guess thats the way of the world though.
Thanks =)

Answer 4 out of 8

by Hardcore Conservative on Oct 26, 2009 at 12:17 pm Permalink

Avatar
Absolutely it's right. That is, after all, what the military is all about. Winning battles.
8
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments show all comments Show More
Avatar Hardcore Conservative Oct, 27 2009 at 06:31 AM
As a veteran myself, I conducted myself according to the laws of war.
Proving my point, the morality of bombing Hiroshima and Nagaski was a moral decision left to the politicians, not the troops. You should know that the art of war on the ground is a dirty, bloody business and sometimes morals go right out the window when it comes down to saving your ass from being killed.
Avatar Anonymous Oct, 27 2009 at 07:02 AM
I understand. Been there, done that, 2 clusters on my Heart. My remarks related to the wanton killing of civilians such as occurred in Iraq. Troops lose a comrade in an ambush, wipe out a village in retaliation. UNSAT conduct. Failure of leadership.
Avatar Hardcore Conservative Oct, 27 2009 at 07:13 AM
If you're talking about the "alleged" Haditha incident, you're a little off. Everyone involved has been found not guilty except two. Charges were dropped against one and another is still pending (after 4 years).

Answer 5 out of 8

by TheJoker on Oct 23, 2009 at 2:04 am Permalink

Avatar
So long as it adheres to international law, then yes.
8
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 6 out of 8

by Marinein09 on Oct 26, 2009 at 7:31 pm Permalink

Avatar
so long as its legal as in hes a combatant

OORAH
2
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 7 out of 8

by alvaro on Oct 26, 2009 at 12:21 pm Permalink

Avatar
Yes to both questions. Anyone not willing to kill has no business joining the military.
2
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)

Answer 8 out of 8

by Geo is a graphic TROLL on Oct 26, 2009 at 12:28 pm Permalink

Avatar
It doesn't matter whether it's or wrong. If you're brainwashed, you're covered.
-1
Pts
 
 
Rate Answer
 
flag
Comments (be the first to comment)


Add an Answer

Should you kill someone from a different country you are at war with, while you are in the Military because your superior ordered you to. Is it right?

How to write a good answer
Your answer:

Display answer in fixed-width font (good for tables or text diagrams)

Answers must adhere to our Terms of Use

To create links, just type the address with no HTML code. Use the Preview button at the bottom to verify.

You can edit your answer at any time.

Add Video Add Iimage


Important: Answerbag cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers submitted by members, and we recommend that you use common sense when following any advice found here. Read full disclaimer.