- NEW!
by Brian I on October 21st, 2009
In any country where it is a popular sport. How on earth FIFA decided a few years ago to hold it in a country where it is a minority sport is beyond me.
by Greekgod on October 21st, 2009
At the home of football. Britain
by slothmister on October 21st, 2009
In any country that is...
1. Safe
2. Has the facilities to both hold such huge games and to transport the fans around.
At the present time that kind of limits it to Western European countries (UK, Germany, France, Spain and Italy or a combination of smaller ones), North American Countries and Brazil and possibly Australia/New Zealand.
It should also be limited to countries that call if by its normal name, FOOTBALL.
by Perryman on October 21st, 2009
Anywhere in the United States.
We are so overdue to host one! LOL
by HarveyTidwell99 on October 21st, 2009
Say what?? Hold a soccer world cup? Why would you hold a soccer world cup anyway??
Do You Need any Degrees to Be a Pro Soccer Player?
by Answerbag Staff on May 11th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
How much time is in a game of soccer?
by Answerbag Staff on May 7th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
How many forwards play during a football game?
by Answerbag Staff on May 7th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Do you think I can make it as a pro football/soccer player?
by Karnage on December 2nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
are you a soccer fan?
by ☆italian chick☆ Amadora :D on December 7th, 2011
| 4 people like this
You're reading What is the best place to hold a soccer world cup?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
Thanks Brian. Perhaps they were hoping to spread the faith.
by keithold is a prodigal bagger on October 21st, 2009
No doubt.
by Brian I on October 21st, 2009
This is the second time in the last 20 odd years they have done it. Remember USA 1998? And tbh, that was a huge success! Although it is quite a bit safer there than in South Africa.
by slothmister on October 21st, 2009
It was USA 1998 that I had in mind. I just don't see the point of holding the World Cup there - at least if it's in a football playing country there will be one set of fans who don't have to spend an arm and a leg on transport costs.
by Brian I on October 21st, 2009
Agreed.
by slothmister on October 21st, 2009