- NEW!
by angus1 on October 17th, 2009
Every elective medical or cosmetic procedure should be free.
by quack is whack on October 17th, 2009
I own to having made such a statement.
For the record, I also said that the government should make all forms of birth control (oral, shot, IUD, etc) available to all women, also reagardless of social class or location. That way we effectively reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies in the first place.
by Vaporeongirl on October 17th, 2009
I completely agree with that statement.
by Thriftymaid on October 17th, 2009
You have many rights, but it's not up to taxpayers to pay for you to exercise those rights. You may marry, raise a family, vote, earn a living, speak freely, join organizations -- these are all rights -- the taypayers do not fund your exercise of them.
Absolutely not -- taxpayers should not pay for abortions.
by nice jugs on October 17th, 2009
Agree ,,,who has the right to say not !,,,it's your body after all ,,,??
by Death Panel litigant on October 17th, 2009
If you don't want a baby, there's an easy, free way to do it that works 100% of the time. As a perk, you won't get AIDS or any other STD, and you'll also avoid a lot of heartache. It's absolutely free to you and the taxpayer who shouldn't be on the hook to pay for ANY healthcare but for themselves and whom they are responsible for, like their spouse and the kids they chose to have when they knew the time was right. So simple, yet many still seemed to not have figured it out.
by Gene H on October 17th, 2009
I was just thinking about honeydews. I don't know why.
by Oor Galooly - on October 17th, 2009
Just sterilize all the poor...problem solved.
by Anonymous on October 17th, 2009
I agree entirely. I noticed some people on here said "just don't have sex" or things along those lines. and "abortion is an abomination"
But what about rape? what about situations where carrying the child full term would kill the mother and the baby? and mistakes happen, do you really think that some poor girl should have to struggle her entire life because some asshole knocked her up and left? in that case the girl could not finish college and therefore would not be able to care for a child properly.
And finally what about severely mentally retarded kids? spineobifita, or Downs, a child with one of those or a similar condition wouldn't be much more than a hindrance on their family and society as a whole.
by SoulSearcher on October 17th, 2009
The public already supports preventative measures. Abortion should not be taxpayer supported. Not all taxpayers believe in convenient legalized murder.
by N I C K on October 17th, 2009
I refuse to spend my money funding something that I consider the most appalling and widespread abomination in modern history.
by Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard on October 17th, 2009
I agree with the statement.
by kiwi on October 17th, 2009
lol.....................
No abortions for anyone?
by Have A Nice Day on July 2nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Mississippi is voting today on a constitutional amendment that will outlaw all abortions even when rape and incest is involved. (cont)
by Rufus on November 8th, 2011
| 2 people like this
If a scan revealed your unborn foetus had only one of everything it should have two of would you abort it?
by Ombliss22 on July 17th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Pro-choicers.Is there ANYTHING that could happen that would make you consiider wanting to overturn Roe vs Wade? You have even a 1% open mind
by Freedom00 on August 5th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Abortions for all?
by Have A Nice Day on July 2nd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Someone said “...(Abortion) needs to be available to all women, and whether you are rich or poor, you need to be able to access that right....it’s unfair to women who can not afford an abortion, and that’s why I support public funding." Thoughts?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments