- NEW!
by Factotum on October 13th, 2009
What pisses me off is when narwhals kill walruses and sell their ivory to elephants. Bastards.
by Fiddle Playing Creole Bastard on October 13th, 2009
...and hippos, narwhals, and walruses!
But seriously, I don't mind if someone uses ivory that already exists and hasn't been recently harvested. I have some ivory scrimshaw myself. What does bother me, is the fact that people STILL poach animals to obtain it. That is wrong.
by RC loves ice cream on October 13th, 2009
Unfortunately there seems to be no effective way to stop poaching, so yes. I'd have no objection to ivory from animals that died of natural causes though.
by Route 66Truckerman on October 13th, 2009
NO!! How about Walruses,Hippos and Narwhals!!!???
by RubyReds on October 14th, 2009
Indeed, ivory for animals, not for humans!
+4
by SoulSearcher on October 13th, 2009
Nope, the other animals that have ivory should wear it as well, humans shouldn't.
by punchermuffin on May 31st, 2010
no. i want it decorated and carved in some outlandish piece i can strut around in.
What do elephant trunks mean when they're up?
by Answerbag Staff on May 13th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
How big are an elephant's ears?
by Answerbag Staff on May 13th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Do elephants eat peanut shells?
by Answerbag Staff on April 19th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Can a donkeys and elephants ruin a country?
by Weylon on November 10th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Have you ever heard an elephant sneeze?
by Kenz the Frenz on January 18th, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading I think that only elephants should wear ivory? Do you agree?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
Hey!
The only thing I remember the USS Narwhal killing was a whale off the coast of Morehead City, North Carolina...
by The Chief on October 13th, 2009
No way. That was ruled self-defense.
by Factotum on October 13th, 2009
I think it was ruled s "suicide" or "brain damage".
.
For such a highly evolved cetacean, it's incredibly stupid of one to completely miss the fact that a 5,000 + ton, 314 foot long submarine is transiting on the surface, and then surface DIRECTLY in front of it with absolutely NO CHANCE for either to maneuver to miss the other!
by The Chief on October 13th, 2009
Thank you for your answer. +6
by Freedom00 on October 13th, 2009