- NEW!
by mellow_girl on October 10th, 2009
oh, hell no...
by mother earth on October 10th, 2009
Nobody could be that insane.
by my2cents--Vote for Paul on October 10th, 2009
Against Obama--Yes.
DR away we go. LOL
by SABOTEUR on October 11th, 2009
Twice was one time two many.
by Moongrim on October 11th, 2009
He deserves a third term.
In Prison.
by Ray Del Sol on October 10th, 2009
WTF! NO
by Thriftymaid on October 10th, 2009
It would depend on whom he was running against.
by call me Kat on October 11th, 2009
NOOOOOOOOOOOooooo.
by Rude Bear Ready for Winter on October 11th, 2009
I believe, that given the time and freedom of a third term, Bush could have returned America to what it once was.... a vast ice covered wasteland.
by Old School on October 11th, 2009
Judging from the other answers to this question, stupidity in not a curable condition...;-D...
.
.
.
by Butch on October 10th, 2009
There were mistakes that the Bush Administration made and I voted for Hillary in the Primary, but against BTU (Barrack The Usurper), I would have voted for George Bush in a heartbeat.
by J and B on October 11th, 2009
Ha!
by SoulSearcher on October 11th, 2009
No, even though we went from bad to worse.
by redcatt63 is around here somewhere...... on October 12th, 2009
I didn't vote for him before, and never would.
by Factotum on October 11th, 2009
It would definitely depend on who else was in the running. I would have preferred McCain.
by jimmy2060 on October 11th, 2009
he was never elected the first two times,history says he was appointed because of tech. problems. we have totaly lost it all. look at ALFRED E OBAMA,Hilory was doing fine then all at once she quit,hummm i wonder why,look at Ross Perot,after they threatened his family enough he bowed out,you aint seen nothing yet,grab your butt and hang on for a good ride.
by TAPriceCTR s son is wearing his COAT on October 10th, 2009
no, I would have still voted for palin. anyone who disrupts the status quo has my vote because the beaurocrasy of our nation is preserving the quo long after it has lost it's status.
bush didn't do anything noteworthy except out a tyranical dictator. if we were so alone in that we why did international courts execute him? yes we have stupid americans who villify bush but the simple fact is he didn't do half the "evils" the dems blame on him and what he did was not as evil as the dems claim.
I have yet to see obama do anything but give executives money. the bailout bill could have gone to the masses giving every american 2,000 which would immediately pay off bills or buy goods stimulating the economy... executives just use it to take an extra vacation or invest which functions as greater debt for an economy which already has too much investment and not enough consumers. he still has a chance to earn my vote next election but he hasn't yet
by Sharona Life is a Tale Told by an Idiot on October 14th, 2009
Please don't even let me look at any names on here that said yes. I'm getting off now real real quickly.
by Dog Chaser on October 14th, 2009
Beleive it or not, for me, hard to say. Alot that he did was good but he did not address illegal alien situation and in the last 2 years of his presidency, he did not exercise his veto power enough against the lib. congress.
by Z-Weezy on October 14th, 2009
Should have voted for Chuck Norris, couldn't have been any worse than what we got. Too bad people are attracted to horrible campaign platforms, and even worse campaign slogans. Seriously, what about America really needed to be "changed" that Obama, once elected, would have been able to change? People just assumed Bush was the worst thing ever, and blindly voted for Democrats in hope of change. People should start voting based on the issues instead of going straight down the ballot choosing their respective party.
.
People don't want the war in Iraq, but how many of the protesters have actually been to Iraq, and how many of those people complained when gas was $4 a gallon? People complain about taxes, but how many of these same people rely heavily on government social programs in multiple facets of their life? People want change, but when change is presented they complain. Figuratively speaking, the American people need to stop being biatchs.
by knotcrafter@yahoo.com on October 11th, 2009
Given the choices we had between power-mad, freedom-hating, tax and spend marxist Obama and I'll-Say-Whatever-Will-Get-Me-Elected McCain, you betcha...in a New York minute!
by natedog on October 11th, 2009
If he was running against Obama Yes
by Shatzee coming back? on October 11th, 2009
If my only other choice was Obama, then yes I would!
by kybear on October 14th, 2009
If the opponent was Obama, I would vote for Bush in a heartbeat even though I think he made some major mistakes.
Why are Bush & Cheney scared to attend the Ground Zero celebration with President Obama?
by Halliburton Shill on May 5th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Should George W. Bush be prosecuted for murder?
by purplecows on May 30th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Isn't it funny that libs still blame GWB for everything bad but won't admit every intel asset that got Bin Laden was GWB-created?
by More2Be on May 8th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Back in the day who said "Reaganomics" was all voodoo?
by -O-uknow on July 4th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Dick Cheney wanted Bush to bomb Syria in 2007. Should Bush have taken his advice? How many wars is enough?
by GibsonGuy on August 26th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading If you could have, would you have voted for Bush for a third term?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments