- NEW!
man can have sex with animals such as sheeps, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village; however, selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.” From Khomeini’s book, “Tahrirolvasyleh”
They rape virgins inside prison in the name of Allah. They take the refuge of Shariah Law in molesting and raping male and female on a regular basis. According various confirmed information, such culture of rape inside prison was introduced by none but the very known ´Grand Mullah´ of Iran – Ayatollah Khomeini.
The American Chronicle/ Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury
Links:
Raped and beaten for daring to question President Ahmadinejad’s election
London Protest for Apostates: Christian Converts out of Islam
Iranian boy tells of prison rape ordeal
Iranian officials accused of raping prisoners
Rape inside prison is nothing new in Islamic Iran. Mullahs and state authority patronize such barbaric acts by saying, anyone who would rape a female or male in the prison will get special rewards from Allah. Being inspired by such sermons of the nasty Mullahs, prison guards on a regular basis go for vaginal and anal rape of females. Bottles of ´Coke´ are even penetrated inside the private parts of the females in prison. On the other hand, youth and males in prison are regularly raped by the prison guards. Sometimes, batton and metal objects are penetrated inside the moles.
It is known beyond a shadow of a doubt, that during the 1980s, the rape of women political prisoners was prevalent. It was so prevalent as to make Ayatollah Montazeri, who was Khomeini´s deputy at the time, write the following to Khomeini in a letter dated October 7, 1986: “Did you know that young women are raped in some of the prisons of the Islamic Republic?”
In response, Ayatollah Khomeini wrote, “Yes! Such rapes are essential to prevent those anti Islam females from entering the heaven. If they are executed as virgins, they will enter the heaven. So, rapes are extremely important and done to prevent such elements from entering the heaven.”
Even recently, according to Iranian Parliamentary investigation committee, protestors, jailed after the disputed presidential elections, were raped in prison. Defeated Iranian presidential candidate Mehdi Karroubi said in a letter to powerful cleric Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, “A number of detainees have said that some female detainees have been raped savagely. Young boys held in detention have also been savagely raped.”
Karroubi’s “confidential letter” was delivered on July 29 to Rafsanjani in his capacity as head of the Assembly of Experts, the powerful body which selects and supervises the activities of the supreme leader.
A police statement issued on August 6, 2009 confirmed that serious violations took place in Kahrizak prison. The authorities said they had jailed the head of the detention centre.
“The head of the centre has been sacked and jailed. Three policemen who beat detainees have been jailed as well,” IRNA quoted Iran’s police chief Esmail Ahmadi-Moghaddam as saying.
The June 12 election plunged Iran into its biggest internal crisis since the 1979 Islamic revolution, exposed deepening divisions in its ruling elite and set off a wave of protests that left 26 people dead.
Protests gripped Tehran and other cities after the vote, which moderates say was rigged to secure the re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
A Revolutionary Court on August 8, 2009 charged a French woman, two Iranians working for the British and French embassies in Tehran and dozens of others with spying and assisting a Western plot to overthrow the system of clerical rule.
Espionage and acting against national security are punishable by death under Iran’s Islamic law.
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner urged Iran to free 24-year-old French academic Clotilde Reiss, and rejected accusations against her of spying and helping a Western plot against Iran. “I want to clearly tell the Iranian authorities: these allegations are not true, Clotilde Reiss isn’t guilty of anything,” Kouchner said on LCI television.
“She did nothing but walk alongside protesters for one hour one time, and 1-1/2 hours another time. She did not submit a report, she sent a brief note to the director of the French Institute for Iranian Research, which is a cultural institute,” he said, demanding she be freed.
The French embassy in Tehran was ready to give refuge to Iranian post-election protestors fleeing police, Kouchner said.
“What was said was true, if protestors who were being chased had sought refuge in the French embassy the instruction was to open the door,” Kouchner was quoted as saying in the Le Parisien/Aujourd’hui en France newspapers.
This is in our democratic tradition,” he added.
U.S. national security adviser Jim Jones, speaking on American television, said the United States had urged Iran to release three American hikers who were detained there recently.
“We have sent strong messages that we would like these three young people released as soon as possible, and also others that they have in their custody as well,” Jones told NBC’s “Meet the Press.” The Iranian government acknowledged on Sunday that it had the three Americans in its custody, he said.
Descripency in law:
The Islamist movement’’s “justice” and “liberation” excludes women, who are indeed explicitly discriminated against! A few examples from the Islamic Republic may help.
In the courts evidence of female witnesses is inadmissible unless accompanied by that of a male witness. Even then, the value of a female witness is half that by the male [Article 33 and 99 of the Law of Retribution: Hodoud and Ghesas, Section 2 of Article 237].
The diyeh [blood money] for a Muslim woman in cases of manslaughter and murder is half that of a Muslim man. [Article 300, Law of Retribution]. If a male Muslim intentionally kills a Muslim women, he is subject to retribution [an eye for an eye] but only if the guardian of the murdered woman pays him half of the diyeh to the murderer to make up the deficiency [Article 6 of Diyat, Article 209 Law of Retribution]. The blood money payable to the murderer amounts to 50 camels or 100 cows or the equivalent [Article 3, Diyat].
A husband can kill his adulterous wife without punishment while a woman is punishable by death for a similar crime.
Before the law, women are not a compete person their testimony is only half that of a man. These absurd efforts to place arbitrary and discriminatory values on women has serious repercussions on how women are thought of and treated by society.
Extramarital sex is prohibited under Islamic law. To this extent Islam recognises rape as a crime. However rape taking place within the home and prisons is not considered rape and is therefore legal.
The Koran [Nesa, 34:34] ascribes to men dominance over, but also responsibility for the women under their care. Women have to be given nafagheh [upkeep money], but in return must submit to their husband’s will. If a woman disobeys her husband’s will, he is instructed to separate their bed and to talk with his wife. If she continues to thwart his desires, he should hit her. The moment she stops disobeying, the punishment and sanctions for misbehaviour should stop. The Koran thus tells a man to respect his wife’s rights, while also instructing him to abuse her.
Moreover women are sex objects. A man is permitted four “ordinary” wives and as many “temporary wives” [concubines] as he wishes. A Muslim woman cannot marry a non-Muslim [Article 1059 of the Civil Law] but a Muslim man can marry a non-Muslim.
According to Islamic law the executing a virgin woman to death is prohibited. This reflects the objectification of women. In prison, if a virgin woman is to be executed, she is first “married” [raped] by one of the guards before execution. Afterwards the guard goes to the woman’s family and declares that she is their son-in-law. It is totally distinct from the process of obtaining confession or to humiliate the prisoner. The prison guards are simply obeying Islamic law.
Nadereh was educated in France and had been in touch with opposition groups against the Shah. On the eve of the revolution she returned to Iran to take part in the anti-dictatorial movement against the Shah. For Naderh, like other Iranian intellectuals, it was vital to be present in this decisive historic struggle. During the revolution she worked for a socialist organisation.
She was arrested three years after the revolution. Although others with her alleged crime normally received a few years imprisonment, she was executed after a few month in prison.
In prison her interrogator took a fancy to her. She had more than once complained of her interrogators advancing towads her. When her case went to court, which consisted of one mullah as judge and no jury, the interrogator accused Nadereh of attempting to escape during her interrogation. The mullah accepted this obviously false charge and sentenced her to death. Both the mullah as the interrogator knew full well that this also gave the interrogator permission to rape Nadereh. The interrogator got what he wanted and fulfilled his ´religious obligation´. Thousands of young women were executed in Iranian prisons, while most of them were raped under Islamic law.
Iranian Political Prisoner´s Action Committee has published a list of 1,400 females, who were raped before execution by the prison guards. Many of them were below 17 in age.
Women who demonstrate against the government in Iran are risking more than we can imagine. Demonstrators against the regime in Iran are faced with the death penalty. this includes demonstrators who are well under eighteen years of age. But Iran makes justice run through the twisted labyrinth of Shaaria law as it is interpreted by Iran’s corrupt theocracy.
How twisted is it? Consider this. according to the Jerusalem Post, girls who are virgins may not be executed, no matter what their crimes. So how do you execute a girl who is a virgin? Very simple. You have a prison guard marry her. When he consummates his “marriage” to the condemned, then she can be executed the following morning. The Jerusalem Post reports a conversation with a member of the Basij militia as follows.
“When he was 16,” my mother took me to a Basiji station and begged them to take me under their wing because I had no one and nothing foreseeable in my future. My father was martyred during the war in Iraq and she did not want me to get hooked on drugs and become a street thug. I had no choice,” he said.
He said he had been a highly regarded member of the force, and had so “impressed my superiors” that, at 18, “I was given the ‘honor’ to temporarily marry young girls before they were sentenced to death.”
In the Islamic Republic it is illegal to execute a young woman, regardless of her crime, if she is a virgin, he explained. Therefore a “wedding” ceremony is conducted the night before the execution: The young girl is forced to have sexual intercourse with a prison guard – essentially raped by her “husband.”
“I regret that, even though the marriages were legal,” he said.
Why the regret, if the marriages were “legal?”
“Because,” he went on, “I could tell that the girls were more afraid of their ‘wedding’ night than of the execution that awaited them in the morning. And they would always fight back, so we would have to put sleeping pills in their food. By morning the girls would have an empty expression; it seemed like they were ready or wanted to die.
“I remember hearing them cry and scream after [the rape] was over,” he said. “I will never forget how this one girl crawled at her own face and neck with her finger nails afterwards. She had deep scratches all over her.”
The individual who spoke with the reporter was himself later arrested. What was his crime? Knowing what was in store for a female detainee, he set her free, rather than subjecting her to a legalised rape and execution. Apparently there is a decency among common folk that seems to elude their spiritual leaders. Even the “professional husband” employed by the Ahmadinejad regime suffered pangs of conscience.
The article in the Jerusalem Post also describes Basij members abusing their authority to go on “wilding” sprees which include robbery, violence and sexual abuse.
The image of Islam is disgraced by the latest revelations to come from Iran. The supposed ‘theocracy” in Iran is nothing but a pack of gangsters that should be denounced and fought for their violence and their fatuous fatwas. The factions of the clergy in Iran should speak out against the atrocities committed in the name of Islam. What started out as a revolt against a stolen election will become a revolt against corrupt theocracy. Silence is complicity.
Share and Enjoy:
by LashTyphoon on October 10th, 2009
No, This has been going on for thousands of years. we cant stop it. Im not jewish or muslim. Thier belifes tell them this. Zealots will keep going.
by jin jang on October 10th, 2009
I would say that figure is extremely high,and there is probably more like 1000.Where do you get your figures from? It sounds like fear mongering to me.Anytime any race,culture,or peoples are centered out it only creates hate,not intelligent reasoning.If one does not deeply look into the study of cultures they really are following hearsay,which is usually tainted with misconceptions.If you use one example or follow the media,then it is following the premise of the lemming to the sea syndrome.They do not know why they ,as masses,jump into the sea,nor do they ask.We have the potential for reasoning ,we should use it.
by Baggins on October 17th, 2009
Any religion that calls for the killing of ANY innocent is, in my opinion, NOT a religion. It is a cancer. A disease that needs to be educated against and dealt with. Yes, I am very, very concerned.
by iwnit on October 17th, 2009
I don't think that there are some many extremists of that kind.
1) "The Middle East Media Research Institute, or MEMRI for short, is a Middle Eastern press monitoring organization founded by former Israeli intelligence officers. Its headquarter is located in Washington, DC, with branch offices in Jerusalem, Berlin, London, Rome, Shanghai and Tokyo. MEMRI consistently picks for translation and dissemination the most extreme views from Arabic and Farsi media, which portray the Arab and Muslim world in a negative light, while ignoring moderate views that are often found in the same media outlets. According to Juan Cole, Professor of Modern Middle East History at the University of Michigan, MEMRI has a tendency to "cleverly cherry-pick the vast Arabic press, which serves 300 million people, for the most extreme and objectionable articles and editorials" Laila Lalami, writing in The Nation, states that MEMRI "consistently picks the most violent, hateful rubbish it can find, translates it and distributes it in e-mail newsletters to media and members of Congress in Washington". As a result, critics such as Ken Livingstone state, MEMRI's analyses are "distortion.""
Source and further information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_Media_Research_Institute
2) "Call of Genocide of Jews:
In a speech delivered by Yaqoub, which aired on Al-Rahma TV on January 17, 2009, he stated (as translated by MEMRI) that:
"We must believe that our fighting with the Jews is eternal, and it will not end until the final battle...You must believe that we will fight, defeat, and annihilate them, until not a single Jew remains on the face of the Earth...As for you Jews - the curse of Allah upon you. The curse of Allah upon you, whose ancestors were apes and pigs. You Jews have sown hatred in our hearts, and we have bequeathed it to our children and grandchildren. You will not survive as long as a single one of us remains...Oh Jews, may the curse of Allah be upon you. Oh Jews... Oh Allah, bring Your wrath, punishment, and torment down upon them. Allah, we pray that you transform them again, and make the Muslims rejoice again in seeing them as apes and pigs. You pigs of the earth! You pigs of the earth! You kill the Muslims with that cold pig [blood] of yours.""
Source and further information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Hussein_Yacoub
by Jacques on October 10th, 2009
This guy is just an Arab equivalent of a TV evangelist, giving twisted history lessons about oppression. There are 2 billion Arabs on Earth, I would be amazed if 100 million of them believed this koranic talk show host nonsense.
by Gene H on October 10th, 2009
There might be a lot of radicals. 100,000,000? Doubtful. Heck, there might be that many radical christians, too, then. All 3 of the religions from that desert suck. I'm just as afraid going to my medical clinic as I would be going to Mecca.
by Oor Galooly - on October 17th, 2009
Yeah and half of them are on this site.
When Jesus was on the cross, do you think God was all like "you human bastards you've.....killed my son"?
by Have A Nice Day on August 21st, 2011
| 1 person likes this
The Lord's prayer says .. Lead us not into temptation! (am I supposed to think thats one of the things the Lord does lead us into it?)
by aiar on November 3rd, 2011
| 1 person likes this
I wonder - how would you respond when it is proven that God does exist? That there is undisputed, factual evidence of his existence?
by Odyssee on August 14th, 2011
| 5 people like this
Is it a sin to pick out an outfit or pair of shoes without praying for Jesus and/or God to tell you what to buy?
by Have A Nice Day on August 22nd, 2011
| 2 people like this
Can Truth violate an individuals intuitive sense of justice or logic? Why or why not?
by Freedom00 on August 9th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading There is an estimated 100,000,000 radical Muslims like the man in this video. Are you concerned or afraid?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
That's quite the list, thanks. I think?
by Abbyguy on October 17th, 2009
Its interesting don't you think so?
by Catherine on October 17th, 2009
Yes, very.
by Abbyguy on October 17th, 2009
Abby google Iranian underground churches....its amazing how Christ came in dreams for these people...Iran is searching its soul and finding Christ....
by Catherine on October 18th, 2009
Catherine! Did you forget about the nasty things priests did when churches had the power in west? What makes you think Christianity will be any better than Islam if it gets the power? And what exactly is an under ground church? There are hundreds of churches in Iran right now.
by Sokoot on March 25th, 2010
Listen dont compare Priest to these people....Priest will get theres believe me...Priest aren't going around killing people for Christ....Wake up
by Catherine on March 25th, 2010
It's an obvious fact that priests don't go around killing people right now because they have no real power in the Christian countries specially in their ruling systems. I was talking about the time when churches used to rule the countries and at that time priests did things alot worse than what mollas are doing in Iran, like they used to burn women alive as a punishment for being potential witches or would stone to death those who questioned Christian teachings and stuffs like that.
by Sokoot on March 25th, 2010
Sokoot: There is a huge difference between the Catholic Priests you refer too and Protestant style churches with people who have found Christ without coercion or force of any kind. To say that "all" Christianity is bad because of the actions of a few is mis-guided at best. Remember every church is still made up of people, sinful people like you and Catherine and I are. When we accept Christ as our saviour it does not mean we instantly become pure, holy and sinless, it just means that we have given ourselves to Him and ask for His help to overcome any issues we may have and to "try" and never to repeat past those or any transgression ever again. No one is perfect so please don't expect anyone to be.
by Abbyguy on March 25th, 2010
Thank you Abby...its true
by Catherine on March 25th, 2010
I never said Christianity itself is a bad thing as you can't claim Islam itself is bad as long as they stay a personal matter and don't interfere with other aspects of one's life. But as soon as you give a religion the power they will become aggressive no matter what type of religion it is.
What is Protestant? It is Christianity minus the ruling power. There isn't much difference between Islam and other religions if it stay out of politics. Indonesia is a good example of a secular and muslim country.
Or even Iran which Catherine mentioned in her post, thirty something years ago during the previous regime which was to some extent a secular one Iran used to execute a few people in a year and at that time was at the bottom of the list of the executions in the world but right now Iran has the world record of executions in a year after China. See what happens when the religion enters the ruling system?!
by Sokoot on March 26th, 2010
Sokoot: We have to look at history to understand what has happened and what will hapen again if we don't stand up to the forces that are gathering against the West as we now know it. In the past prior to reformation the church was rule by what we now call the Catholics, they did some horrible things to the world with the Crusades and so on. But since the reformation the Protestant arm has evolved into a more Christ-like church - for the most part - by becoming peaceful, charitable and loving people into it rather than forcing itself upon anyone. I know that guilt and pressure have played a big part but that only works on a personal level, whereas if you look at the history of Islam you will see that they had a time equal to if not surpassing the tyranny of the Catholics. They are now emerging to try and overtake the world once again, but not through peaceful means, not by any stretch of the imagination. All one has to do is read the Qu-ran to understand that they are speaking out of both sides of their mouths when they say they are a peaceful religion. It is evidenced by the actions of the radicals we now see today. You may say that they are a minority, but I ask you where do they get the radical ideas from? They are derived straight from the Qu-ran itself, because calls for world domination using whatever means deemed necessary, including terrorism and torture. It calls Jews pigs and apes that must be killed, it calls anyone who is not a Muslim an Infidel. It states that infidels are to be offered the opportunity to convert to Islam and if they choose not to they are to die.
Conversely the Bible calls for peace and love of they neighbor and especially an enemy. Jesus called for this Himself, whereas Muhammad called for war against all who would oppose. it is easy to see if one studies the two religions that there is a HUGE difference between them.
There IS a war of terror coming, it would behove you to be prepared for it by trying to understand the mind of the enemy, this is done by reading the Qu-ran. If you don't have one then you can get a free one online as I have done. There are a number of sites that would be happy to provide you with one.
by Abbyguy on March 26th, 2010
I already am to some extent familiar with Quran and yes it is hursh in parts but it's a book that is written a thousand years ago, what do you expect? Having hursh and barbaric teachings is common in Bible too which can be used as a source for Christian exrimists. All the things that Catholics, as you refer to them, did in the past was according the teachings of Bible not any other holy books.
But I want to know where exactly in Quran it calls Jews pigs and asks Muslims to kill them? This is the first time I'm hearing this. Names of both Jews' and Christians' prophets come in quran several times with honor and there is even a chapter in the name of virgin Mary then how can this book call the followers of those religions pigs?
Saying that Muslims are supposed to kill Jews is an insult to both jews and Muslims who are living in Muslim countries. I'm not going to talk behalf of all Muslim countries, maybe the situation differs in other places, but as in Iran, the country that I'm living in, I can say at least today with all the hypes and hatred that are in western media, Jews and Christians have a better life in Iran than Muslims have in west. There were a few Jew students in my high school and more Christians and I don't remember anybody ever insulted them in anyway and of course they never disrespected Muslims either.
It seems that you don't know that there is a difference between Zionists, who some Muslim countries have problem with, and Jews. But it's not your fault you are not supposed to know.
by Sokoot on March 26th, 2010