| The last question was answered in just | 4 | minutes Let our thousands of members help! |
Welcome to Answerbag, a community of people sharing what they know. Top Answer out of 13 by Tom on Oct 5, 2009 at 9:29 am Permalink
Comments
And who, exactly, would we invade? The US already occupies Iraq, Afghanistan, Qatar, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.
. And how would we pay for the $300/bbl. oil that's needed to power all of the tanks/planes/APCs/trucks/etc.?
Tom, I can see your point, but dang details... The US would have to institute a draft to raise enough troops to invade & occupy Iran or Pakistan, either of which would be Iraq x 5 or 10 in terms of difficulty and casualties. Who would pay for that when the US is in a depression due to the loss of NY and other cities, and China has cut off our credit because we're no longer a good risk? And the perps would be a few smallish cells moving around; millions of soldiers couldn't defend against that.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but the devil's in the details.
I agree. I also think it's wrong. I'm just pointing out what the US is likely to do based on thier advertised policy and their history in similar situations. I don't think that it is the right thing to do, and I definately have some issues about what "Old School" had to say about how we have to pay for this. We are in such a financial recession right now, the last thing we need is an expensive war to pay finance. Now that we no longer have a member of the Bush family in office, maybe the new administration will hopefully take a look at alternatives.
Answer 2 out of 13 by qwerty on Oct 5, 2009 at 9:44 am Permalink
Comments
show all comments
Oops, forgot points.
well I wold think if the country would allow this to happen, even without being invloved the US would hold that country accountable
like I said the did it with Iraq, there was never and concrete evidence that any terrorist group was based in Iraq, Bushy boy went on shady data and did it anyway I think the same would happen to any country that would have lax enough security thay wouls d allow nukes to be stolen
Yeah... I just feel like there's no "good" answer.
Answer 3 out of 13 by Randoley on Oct 5, 2009 at 9:41 am Permalink
Comments
show all comments
They'd waffle and give up a few small fry at most, or, more likely, refuse and give excuses and trust in their god.
then, BOOM!
That'd kill millions and probably cause a revolution to install an Islamist shadow gov't who wouldn't hesitate to nuke us again. Plus the Arab world would immediately embargo oil for our "attacks on Islam", sending us into a depression.
I don't know what the least-worst answer would be. Answer 4 out of 13 by ExactlyTwentyLetters on Oct 5, 2009 at 9:31 am Permalink
Comments
show all comments
I respectfully disagree. I think if a nuclear bomb was detonated in a major US city, everything we know about the rules of engagement would change dramatically.
You might be right. Maybe especially if Washington, DC is nuked and the gov't decapitated.
But I also doubt that much of the US public understands that just because we might "leave terrorists alone", they'd leave us alone... so there'd be pressure to retreat and save hundreds of thousands of US lives.
Answer 5 out of 13 by King of the Cheeses on Oct 5, 2009 at 9:31 am Permalink
Comments
show all comments
There can't be a Muslim world if the world under them was boiled away. With nukes.
We might have enough to hit every city over, I dunno, 250,000 people (????????) in Syria, Iran, Pakistan, killing (murdering, IMO) tens of millions, but that would leave about 900 million.
Almost 50 years ago the Russians created a nuke with an 8km fireball (and much larger blast radius). After they halved it's size. I'm sure that today if America really wanted to they could build nukes in large enough numbers and power to take care of any number of pesky innocent civilians.
Answer 6 out of 13 by Jim in a Nautilus COAT on Oct 5, 2009 at 8:03 pm Permalink
Comments
But do we nuke Islamabad and other Pak. sites to punish a few dozen people who are responsible for giving the terrorists the nukes? The Arabs would immediately cut off oil to us, sending us into a depression, and millions of Pakis would be resolved to do anything to nuke us again.
If four of our major cities were wiped off the face of the earth and millions dead, then if they wouldn't handle rounding up those responsible and putting them on trial, yes.
Answer 7 out of 13 by Siyanor on Oct 5, 2009 at 9:31 am Permalink
Comments
show all comments
yet!
Iran will within a matter of years. Pakistan already has them.
That is why the Taliban is fighting so hard to take over Pakistan.
Answer 8 out of 13 by Moongrim on Oct 6, 2009 at 4:36 am Permalink
Comments
Well, we *could* destroy Muslim civilization by murdering millions, at the cost of destabilizing large parts of the world and isolating ourselves into an oil-less depression. But not all of the bad guys would be gone, and more bad guys would sign on to hit us with more Pakistani nukes.
You can't circumsize muslims.
There's just no end to those pr**cks. Answer 9 out of 13 by Occams Electric Razor on Oct 5, 2009 at 8:05 pm Permalink
Comments
Terrorists don't "launch", they slip a bomb into NY or DC. We could trace that it originated in Pakistan, probably, but then what do you do - kill millions because of rogue Islamist officers who allowed the nukes to be "stolen"?
Answer 10 out of 13 by hawaii.jake on Oct 5, 2009 at 1:19 pm Permalink
Comments
Beware of the Blob.
Important: Answerbag cannot guarantee the accuracy of answers submitted by members, and we recommend that you use common sense when following any advice found here. Read full disclaimer.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

