- NEW!
Help answer this question below.
Nothing but pure energy. Scientists keep looking deeper into the atom and keep finding something else, never getting to the end. There will come a point when we see that everything is made of nothing.
Long-lived matter, the stuff we are used to dealing with on an daily basis, is made of only three basic "matter" particles:
1) electrons
2) "up" quarks
3) "down" quarks
Protons and Neutrons are made of combinations of three quarks. Protons have two up quarks and one down quark, while neutrons have two down quarks and one up quark.
I'm going with plasma.
What is the freezing point of soda pop?
by Answerbag Staff on February 19th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
why do you think people put masked to cover who they really are.
by tamarapowellv on October 2nd, 2011
| 3 people like this
Cal gave Brad and Jenny as many sport cards as each of them already has.Then Brad gave Cal and Jenny as many sports cards of them presently
by lelieu on November 5th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
Does the fact that matter is mostly space make any difference? Why or why not?
by ayano155 on December 6th, 2010
| 1 person likes this
How to create a plasma state artificially.
by ♥ "Nirmals309" ♥ on January 1st, 2012
| 1 person likes this
You're reading From what does matter consist of?
Comments
or perhaps maybe made of something less conventional, like vibrations of a string.....
by CaRbOnPrOdUcK is Baccuss on September 5th, 2009
Then scientists will look into strings I guess and let's see what they find.
Am I right in thinking that scientists believe strings are almost more than 3 or 4 dimensional?
by Tim Unbounded on September 5th, 2009
Some say up to 12. But although it's not the main stream favorite theory, I believe things are beginning to shift a little more in its favor. The reason, for one, it solves almost all of the infinities and anomolies suffocating the equations inside the point particle model, second, it explains why the deeper we go inside a "atom" the more so called "particles" we find. It's because we' might not be looking at point particles at all, but cross sections of strings that will never point definitive. I just think anything with so many mathamatical dead ends as point particle physics has, deserves to at least seriously question its valitity as our final standard model. Especially when there is an alternative one to study that meets a more stringent mathamatic efficiency.
by CaRbOnPrOdUcK is Baccuss on September 5th, 2009
Thanks
by Tim Unbounded on September 6th, 2009
Thank you +
by Anonymous on September 6th, 2009
So everything is made from Protons, neutrons and electrons. These 3 molecules are the same in everything, or there are different in, lets say oxygen, and gold ? And if they are the same in every thing, what makes thing different in properties, texture and look ?
by Anonymous on September 6th, 2009
That's where string theory, in my opinion, blends more naturally with the fabric of the universe sort ot speak, instead of isolating and compartmentalizing atoms and partickles endless spinoffs of each other and their cousins, the universe on a string, (this is a very basic explanation, i don't do it justice) differenciates the properties with a fluctuation in vibration, keeping everything as one, yet also as individual as point particle model trys to employ. The differnece is, and this is very important in my opinion, is one theory, point particle elements are riddled with mathamatic anomolies and endless infinities that cant seem to be resolved. I don't trust anything with much enthusiasm, that needs that much correcting before it can function as a real solution. Strings are future science fallen on accident by a scientific accidental landing onto a modern day scientists lap. I could go on, but the point is. I believe in string theory. And love watching it grow up.
by CaRbOnPrOdUcK is Baccuss on September 6th, 2009
Didn't understand anything, but thank you. I still think that everything is made from the exact same thing.
by Anonymous on September 6th, 2009
That's essentially what i just said. ;)
by CaRbOnPrOdUcK is Baccuss on September 6th, 2009
I did start reading a book on string theory but became totally lost in it.
What fascinated me about it was the idea that you can one can imagine having more than 3D in 3D, with sufficient looping and consideration of surfaces.
Cheers CarbonProduct.
by Tim Unbounded on September 6th, 2009
It's easy to get lost in a science that takes five differnt branches of math working together, in order to progress forward. Most of the hurdle's are stuck in the math that must literally be designed for this cooberation. I'll follow this until i die, because to me, it' seems like the first step has been taken, to truely unlocking some of the Universes delicious secrets ....
by CaRbOnPrOdUcK is Baccuss on September 6th, 2009