women are 50% of the human race and not yet one stands up i am surprized and sad

ban all religious signs

A veil was a prostitute's uniform in Biblical times! [Genesis:38:15] Tamar seducing Judah, her lecherous father-in-law, using a veil (!), which was the uniform of prostitutes in those days, simply because Judah wouldn’t let his youngest son take her as wife-widow of his 2 elder brothers! [Genesis:38: 13-19]

If I was a Muslim, I wouldn't let my wife wear that

The issue of full-face-covering under religious pretext has multiple important facets: 1. By any stretch of imagination, the veil originates from the barbaric past custom of ‘protecting’ sexually mature women from risk of rape or or sexual molestation, i.e. a face-veil is an 'anti-rape device'. 2. In primitive, pre-barbaric Mohammedan cultures, where stranger men’s intent is looked with suspicion and assumed to be towards sexual abuse or molestation of women of sexual maturity at the first opportunity; a face veil may serve exactly such purpose of an ‘anti-rape device’, coupled with the stranger/guest’s assurance of ‘salaam-alikum’: “peace to you, i.e., I mean no harm to you, your women, children, slaves, camels, sheep, etc.” 3. That such a ‘veil is a sign of bondage or submission and like ‘cooped hens’, or ‘such veiled woman is a particular man’s possession, or property for his private enjoyment’, is a logical conclusion reached quite easily. 4. Women living in the modern post-barbaric societies insisting on wearing veil either by choice, right or ‘as a religious identity’ could not be true or honest, because (a) the same women would not be able to exercise such choice in the opposite direction: of not wearing a veil, in the primitive, pre-barbaric Mohammedan society; and (b) ‘one’s face may be one’s identity’, but covering it can not be. The arguments by Muslim women about 'choice' & 'fashion statement' is laughable, because a face-cover can never be a 'fashion statement' like a bracelet, bangle (kara), an ornate or colourful forehead sticker (bindi), or a bikini! Quite simply it's a case of ‘Turkeys voting for Christmas!’ 5. These purportedly liberated women also fail to exercise their other right, or ‘choice’ to stay indoors of their husband’s, father’s, brother’s or owner’s home[s] or ‘coops’. 6. The opposite of a ‘face-covering veil with a slit for the veiled person to peep at the outside world’ is wearing dark glasses or ‘shades’, which allows the wearer the privacy of the direction of his/her gaze or stare, but covering just the eyes in such way is quite acceptable, even fashionable or ‘cool’ and not seen as objectionable, unsociable or a sign of bondage. 7. The most insulting and the least recognised aspect of face veil is the automatic branding of of the gentlemen in the post-barbaric societies, or from ‘the unveiled masses with uncovered faces’ as “potential rapists or women-molesters”; who they are certainly not. This is equivalent to asking all men to 'opt-out' of a sexual offenders' register! 8. In the ‘post 9-11’ or ‘post-7-7’ modern societies, concealing one’s face under whatever pretext raises the issue of national security & public safety from risk of ‘concealed identity’ by ‘covered faces’. 9. It is also a serious concern about individual heath and hygiene, given that majority of Muslim women live in hot tropics. There is clear risk of rickets from blocked sunlight, dehydration by heat and sweaty-body-odour. 10. The only excuse for wearing a face-veil could be ‘to conceal ugliness’, which again may be seen as discriminatory against the disability of ugliness… Full-face-covering Veil ought to be unwelcome on the streets of modern society. If it has to be banned by legislation, it would be by necessity & much greater pity. * [Simon A Smith] [537] In Biblical times, full-face veil was the custom of prostitutes, or at least an apparatus for committing the sin of adultery: [Bible, Genesis: 38:15] "When Judah saw her, he thought she was a prostitute, for she had covered her face."

how can muhamed look at women in the eyes with a BURKAH nice mouvie muhamed did do good no one denies that but the writings are bad today kill adulteres kill gays cut hands of theifs give 2.5 % to the poor ( not enought) women gets 50% of what an man gets in inheritence so the good ok the bad not ok we need it said

as in the coran! mumhamed says looks into the eyes of the followers! how can he do so thought a burkah?