- NEW!
by Mr. Wright on August 4th, 2009
No. Wikipedia has better quality control
by BlackDragonBE on August 4th, 2009
No, the bible wasn't updated regulary, it has been the same for more than 2000 years.
Also, it's search function wasn't very effective and the font was kind of small.
by Factotum on August 4th, 2009
Heh, you can make a case for that sure. It was the go-to source and was sometimes added to or rewritten.
What is an "Obvicopter?"
by Running, Fall Up on December 18th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
Are you more likely to donate money to Wikipedia because an attractive woman with large breasts asks you to?
by Old School on December 10th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
What topic is not on Wikipedia? Has everything already been indexed and recorded in the digital landscape?
by Mister_Bromide on November 26th, 2011
| 2 people like this
Have you made a donation to Wikipedia? It would be a shame to see it go considering the number of times it is use on AB.
by Tel UK- Licensed to fish! on January 4th, 2012
| 3 people like this
Awwwwwwww. Poor wittle prowgrawmmer from Wikipedia, Brawdon Woss, wants some money? Will you give Brawdon Woss some money?
by Mister_Bromide on November 25th, 2011
| 1 person likes this
You're reading Was the bible the first wikipedia?
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!
Comments
You are so right, Mr. Wright. The quality and facts are amazing. Thanks.
by HoboJoe on August 4th, 2009
You're welcome! +4
by Mr. Wright on August 4th, 2009