by Lingerer on June 24th, 2009

Question

Help answer this question below.

Why have we not found remains of Noah's ark?

Like
Report

Share:: Facebook; Twitter; Other

Answers. 38 helpful answers below.

by Hammersmith on June 25th, 2009
Because Jay Leno is hiding it in his garage between Alladin's magic carpet and Santa's Sled.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by VandalEyes on June 25th, 2009
Uh, because even if it really happened it was a wood ship that ran aground something like 5000 years ago. Its dust, man. My truck was made 16 years ago and its only held together by duct tape and will. Might as well ask why we never found the apple core left from Adam and Eve eating the fruit of Knowledge.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Rufus_T_Firefly on June 25th, 2009
In 1957, aerial photos revealed a formation that resembles the outline of a ship on Mount Ararat. As yet, there is NO actual proof that the shape is Noah's ark, although there is supposedly an expedition set for sometime in August 2009 to attempt to enter and photograph the formation. Up to now, the Turkish government has not allowed anyone to climb Mount Ararat in order to verify exactly WHAT the shape really is and weather has not been helpful either. In 2006, another formation was discovered in Iran that 'resembles' a ship or ark. We'll have to wait for verification on both. Worthless without pictures and tangible evidence.
Comments
- Even if they find the remains of a ship on Mt. Ararat that has the exact dimensions listed in the BIble, it proves nothing except that boats of that dimension existed. You still have to prove that two of eery animal on earth could fit on the ark and that there was a worldwide flood. Oops, geologists have already proved that there was no worldwide flood--ever.
  
  Report
  
  by Anonymous on August 8th, 2009
- I don't have to prove a damned thing. Did you know you're preaching to an atheist?
  
  Report
  
  by Rufus_T_Firefly on August 9th, 2009
- Yeah those arcs about as real as the virgin mary showing up on pita bread in mexico.
  
  Report
  
  by ConservativelyLiberal on June 26th, 2010
- Actually, even if they ARE real, it doesn't and cannot change the laws of physics.
  
  Report
  
  by Rufus_T_Firefly on June 26th, 2010
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
4 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Ron C on June 25th, 2009
If it existed, it would have been the biggest ship ever built. The Noah tale is just a souped up ancient tail, probably related to the time when the Mediterranean was formed.
Comments
- "The Noah tale is just a souped up ancient tail"
  HAHAHA, it wouldn't have been funny and I would have ignored it except that you spelled it correctly the first time
  
  Report
  
  by Chezter is going to save the Redheads on June 25th, 2009
- Thanks, I try for irony at times. Most of the time, what I think is funny, just slips by and people get upset instead of laughing.
  
  Report
  
  by Ron C on June 26th, 2009
- Based on the description given in the Bible, Noah's ark would also have hardly been the biggest ship ever built. See this page (http://www.arkdiscovery.com/noah's_ark.htm) for a photo that compares the ark to the USS Kittyhawk.
  
  Report
  
  by Glenn Blaylock on August 31st, 2009
- It's an imaginary ship. It can be as big as you imagination. The Noah story was plagerized from earlier tails. It wasn't true when the story was written and it's not true now. By the way, I've been on the Kittyhawk. I landed in a small cargo plane. The ship was too big for me. I like the small boat Navy.
  
  Report
  
  by Ron C on August 31st, 2009
- You are entitled to your opinion, but I choose to respectfully disagree with you. However, when describing the size of the ark, we do have to go with the size that is given in the account. The various star ships Enterprise are definitely fictitious. However, this does not change the fact that they have specific sizes either. So, to state that one is a different size than that given by those that thought them just because they are fictional and you decide that you want them to be bigger does not change the size that is really given for them.
  
  Report
  
  by Glenn Blaylock on August 31st, 2009
- Right but the ark is as real as the starship Enterprise. If god had a way of squeezing 2 of every animal in the Ark, then so be it.
  
  What about the fish? Some species of fish can't live in the fresh water. Did god bother about them or maybe since the story originated in the desert, the tellers didn't think about them.
  
  Report
  
  by Ron C on August 31st, 2009
- As I keep writing, you are free to believe as you wish. I am not going to debate the reality of the story of Noah with you nor am I going to debate the other details. I am just pointing out that your assertion that it was the biggest ship ever built is NOT consistent with the account.
  
  Report
  
  by Glenn Blaylock on September 1st, 2009
- O.k. I quit trying to bring reality into the Noah's Ark story. It's good that an ancient tale was revived for use in the collection of stories, poetry, and philosophy that became the bible. The bible should be read as a history and as the basis for much of western thought and history. The only objection I have is when it is taken more seriously than Shakespeare's plays. Shakespeare too should be read but no be taken as actual history.
  
  Report
  
  by Ron C on September 1st, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
8 comments | Post one | Permalink
by GLAM71 on June 25th, 2009
we as in me and you? if thats the case, we have not found noahs ark, because i refuse to go looking for an arc, and i assume you dont want to search alone.
Comments
- lol nice common i hear turkey is nice this time a year. we can kill a goat or something.
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- i get to go too right?
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- I'll split all the reward money with you, I'm sure we would each get like $1,000 or something.
  
  Report
  
  by Lingerer on June 25th, 2009
- lol literists make me laugh. XD I'm glad I'm not the only one! +2 just for putting a smile on my face
  
  Report
  
  by Seanne on August 12th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
4 comments | Post one | Permalink
by andblack on June 24th, 2009
yes they have it's in turkey mt ararat.
Comments
- they have found absolutely no remains of Noah's ark on or in Mt. Ararat. im not saying it is an impossibility but an improbability.
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- You are right, andblack.
  
  Report
  
  by Theby on June 25th, 2009
- really?... please provide some sources.
  http://www.noahsarksearch.com/ararat.htm
  http://www.noahsarksearch.com/ronwyatt.htm
  http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/ark.php
  http://www.fellowshipinhislove.com/Noahsarkphotos.html
  http://www.fellowshipinhislove.com/Noahsarkinsanities.html
  All of these site say that the "evidence" collected was false. If there were in fact evidence proving it was Noah's ark's existence it would be a topic the church would rub in every ones face.
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- all i did was a simple Google search on the topic. the fact is regardless what was found there all of it was scientifically proven wrong. the only supporting information i could find supporting the evidence as authentic was one saying that Satan altered the remains to trick us and the other was the tourist website (which didn't say it was authentic or not).
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- I did if you look at my answer.
  
  Report
  
  by Jesus is God on June 25th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
5 comments | Post one | Permalink
by MrJosh on June 25th, 2009
We have not yet found the remains of Noah's ark because it never existed.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Nice Guy In Bay Area on June 25th, 2009
Because this is a very inhospitable planet and stuff like that would decay and disappear. Or maybe they took it apart and made shelters with it. It could of been hit by lightning and burned up. It might of been destroyed by termites - where is the Orkin man when you need him?
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by RC loves ice cream on June 25th, 2009
1. Because it never existed.
2. Because if it did, the wood would not survive this long.
3. Because if it did and the wood did survive, there's no way to distinguish a piece of ark from any other old lump of wood.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Randoley on June 25th, 2009
Because wood rots.
Comments
- Doh!
  
  Report
  
  by Cowboy-Matter of Fact on June 27th, 2009
- But even wood leaves remains.
  
  Report
  
  by Moongrim on August 8th, 2009
- But even wood leaves remains.
  
  Report
  
  by Moongrim on August 8th, 2009
- In what form?
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on August 8th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
4 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Jesus is God on June 25th, 2009
Noah's are will be found if God allows it to be found.
Comments
- I thought Jesus was the son of God, no?
  
  Report
  
  by The Mess on June 25th, 2009
- Jesus is God in human form. The "son" aspect is just to explain that portion of God's personality.
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on June 25th, 2009
- Ignore this erroneous comment.
  
  Report
  
  by MrJosh on June 25th, 2009
- God is a schizo. You heard it here, folks.
  
  Report
  
  by Tamilze on June 25th, 2009
- I have one role with my family, one at work and another at church. I am the same person but I put on different hats and perform different duties in my life. Does that make me a schizo too? We all do this and so does God.
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on June 25th, 2009
- You don't become someone else when you go to work, do you?
  
  Report
  
  by Tamilze on June 25th, 2009
- hmmmmmm......I find that contradictory. Was he the son of God or not? The choice is up to you...the choice is up to you. yo ho yo ho yo ho yohoyoho! (My nephew's been watching a lot of Peter Pan)
  
  Report
  
  by The Mess on June 25th, 2009
- God is able to be everywhere at one time, I am not. He may be in Kansas stopping a tornado from crushing an orphanage as God the Father. While at the same time in Bangladesh listening to the prayers of a repentant sinner As Jesus the Son, all the while explaining the meaning of a Bible verse to an old woman in Hungary as the Holy Spirit. He is one God that acts in different capacities as God the Father, God the Son, and God the Spirit all at the same time. I can't think of an easier way to explain it than that. It is a hard thing to grasp.
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on June 26th, 2009
- Yeah, but that would have to make him pretty schizophrenic. I mean, God apparently has a similar working mind to humans, since he used his as a template for ours. The only difference is that he is omnipotent. So, he is able to have three different aspects at the same time, but since his mind is similar to ours, then that would mean the schizophrenic people who have more than one distinct aspect of their personality that have some amount of independence from eachother are more like God than the rest of us.
  
  Report
  
  by Tamilze on June 26th, 2009
- If you had the ability to be everywhere at one time. One person might interact with you as a plumber, another might see you as person just walking down the street, then the 3rd could talk to you as a reporter. We do this in real life, we can only do one thing at a time though. Just today I have been a chauffeur, a home health care person, and a dude on debating on the Internet. I have been 3 different things today, but all with one mind. How is that different than what God does on a grander scale?
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on June 26th, 2009
- Like I asked before, you don't actually become someone else when you do these things, do you?
  
  Report
  
  by Tamilze on June 26th, 2009
- No and neither does God. The father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are just terms used to describe how God works in different situations.
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on June 26th, 2009
- God actually reminds me of Skynet in that way. Skynet can be in serval places at once and do different things all at the same time. However, partially as consequence to this ability, Skynet is insane. The very fact that God has the same abilities and has a mind similar to ours leads me to believe that God is insane as well.
  
  Report
  
  by Tamilze on June 26th, 2009
- Oh well see it as you wish. I can't explain it anymore than I already have.
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on June 26th, 2009
- And you've explained it well. However, your explanation is the same as the one that I would have given, because we seem to have the same perception of what God should be. The only difference is that I think he must be crazy.
  
  Report
  
  by Tamilze on June 26th, 2009
- I don't get that at all, plus on my behalf it isn't a perception of what God should be. It is an understanding of what God is.
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on June 26th, 2009
- Well, I'm trying not to imply that I think there is a God, because I don't. However, I do think that the God described in the Bible is as you explained, more or less. However, since he's not human but does have a similar working mind, the best way that I can imagine him is as something like a rampant AI.
  
  Report
  
  by Tamilze on June 26th, 2009
- Don't know what else I can say.
  
  Report
  
  by Randoley on June 26th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
18 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Jesus is God on June 24th, 2009
Here is some links. http://www.noahsarksearch.com/ronwyatt.htm
Comments
- http://abcnews.go.com/gma/story?id=2133311&page=1 and http://www.arkdiscovery.com/noah's_ark.htm
  
  Report
  
  by Jesus is God on June 24th, 2009
- ok here is a quote from your site "They concluded that the elevated elemental carbon levels were due to the presence of calcium carbonate in some of the rocks. The metallic levels were consistent with the ores found in the region."
  and
  "We think a perfectly valid natural explanation exists for the regular metal readings. This type of volcanic rock, as it cools and contracts, typically fractures into perpendicular joint sets, based on regional stress orientation. The metal readings can then be accounted for as ground water laden with metallic minerals which over the years has been deposited in the cracks."
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- "When Wyatt paid us a visit to discuss the evidence he had found, he produced a very heavy rock approximately 18 inches in length and about 12 wide. He claims it to be a piece of petrified wood from the deck of the Ark. I looked it over pretty closely, and to my untrained eye it certainly looked like petrified wood. I might even go a step further and say it looked like the wood had been hand-tooled.
  My response to Ron was: "If you can prove this came from the formation you may have an Ark on your hands." Ron's reply was that there was a train load of the stuff on the site! We stick by our initial response. If that is indeed petrified wood, and if it can be proven that it came from the "ship", then we may have something."
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- "However, Ron does not seem to understand scientific protocol. He consistently violates the procedures for verification. Right now we do not know where that rock came from. He has had it analyzed by the Galbraith laboratories and the tests indicate that it is silicate replacement.
  Dr. John Baumgardner, Dr. John Morris, Dr. Clifford Burdick, and a Turkish geologist have examined the site and have not seen any evidence of petrified wood. Wyatt, however, claims there is trainload of it there. If this is the case, hopefully, Ron will produce more under the proper procedures for excavation."
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- that site was not saying that this was the ark. I'm sorry. it concluded with
  "We have also received a report of a very mysterious archaeological discovery on the north side of Mt. Ararat. Details are very scanty. It is not supposed to be the Ark, but is in some way connected to Noah. The Turkish government is supposed to be involved. We are trying to confirm details and will report them here if they have any substance."
  like i said before im not saying it is impossible but its improbable.
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
- You must be new, thinking you can talk sense into Jesus is God.
  
  Report
  
  by HasntBeen on June 25th, 2009
- Everyone has the ability to reason with fact. its the individuals choice to listen to it.
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 26th, 2009
- In theory, yes. You're talking to the exception that proves the rule here, though.
  
  Report
  
  by HasntBeen on June 26th, 2009
- well he is going to have to find the ark to prove this one.
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 26th, 2009
- unless he is claiming that Satan tampered with the evidence to test our belief. (what i expect)
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 26th, 2009
- My prediction: "the ark was fuond it was on tv dummy dont you have a tv or no i forgat you live with the devil and your not saved so your tv only tells lies"
  
  Report
  
  by HasntBeen on June 26th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
11 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Seanne on June 25th, 2009
It was made of wood. No doubt it's already rotted to mush by now.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Bowen on June 25th, 2009
We haven't found them for exactly the same reason no one has ever found a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow.

Neither exists, nor has ever existed.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Naamah on June 25th, 2009
Because it never existed. reasons/ 1. Imagine how big a boat would have to be to carry depending on which version you choose to believe, all in the same book, 2 to 7 of each species of animal on the earth. 2. It has already been scientifically, and archeoligically proven that the entire earth has never been flooded at the same period in time.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by buttman on June 25th, 2009
I don't believe there ever was such an ark. It's amazing we can find 2, 3 and 5 million years
old fossil of man and different animals but we can't find anything related to the so-called
Ark. Or maybe we haven't search hard enough, hunh?
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by andblack on June 25th, 2009
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_830WxtZQgQ&feature=PlayList&p=B8FFE9885115A5EB&index=0 here's a more detailed version of noah's ark's please watch. than come back with a conclusion.
Comments
- still no evidence. plus the goat killing thing was kinda weird.
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 25th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by QuartzKitty on August 9th, 2009
You cannot find something that does not, and never has, existed.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by centsless on August 9th, 2009
The myth of Noah's Ark is just a retelling of the Babylonian story of Gilgamesh.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Anonymous on August 9th, 2009
My post was to the person who asked the question, not to the person with an inflated ego.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Moongrim on August 8th, 2009
Wood leaves remains. Not to mention the detritus of thousands of animals fecal remains from such a journey.

Because it's a myth.

The logistics involved in the collection, care, feeding, and redistribution of all said animals, not to mention the work necessary to keep them all well fed, beggars the question: Why did god even bother with Noah's work, if God provided so many miracles to make it work in the first place?

And the sheer size of the ark, just it's empty weight alone- is enough to have it break up in a fairly calm water.

http://www.skepticfriends.org/forum/showquestion.asp?faq=4&fldAuto=390
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by FevoIsGod on June 27th, 2009
OK, i thought about it and Ive got it!

If you think that science and modern technology is the work of Satan then yes the ark has been found!

If not then there is no evidence of the ark yet.

oh yeah and if you use intuition, then through common sense you know what happened to it. (Your intuition is based on your beliefs. so common sense could tell you it did exist and what happened to it. Or it could tell you that it never existed so it has no disposition.)
Comments
- You might be drunk if.....your answer sounds like the one above!
  
  Report
  
  by Lingerer on June 27th, 2009
- um i have no idea what you are talking about... i looked over the answers and i don't see one matching mine... really man no reason to downgrade over your personal opinion. you have to agree that this answer is helpful regardless of your opinion.
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on August 23rd, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
2 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Firebrand on June 25th, 2009
Because it was left on land and wood decays and turns to dust over a period of time never mind thousands of years
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Uniden on June 25th, 2009
I love how folks are saying it never existed like they actually 'know' . Anyhow, there are some folks who claim that they've found it, but truthfully noone really knows. That's possibly the best way to put it..."Noone knows" and anyone claiming to should show some kind of proof. Either way it goes, if they say it did, or didn't, show proof from a trusted website. :P
Comments
- I agree
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 26th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
1 comment | Post one | Permalink
by Nod.Coltsfan on June 25th, 2009
Even if it existed, the wood would be completely decomposed.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Leah on August 8th, 2009
Wood rots, and I could see Noah taking it down to build its house. But many the wood degraded and God would make it became part of nature again.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by matt89 on August 7th, 2009
There have been over 1,000 sightings over the years.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by purplecows on June 26th, 2010
We have ... several different times in different places, in fact.

It's a miracle.

Just like that fact that the total weight of known Fragments of the True Cross™ adds up to several tons.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Tallyman on April 27th, 2010
It seems as though the Chinese people recently did.

The Bible IS accurate.

This is just one more tiny piece of evidence to add to the mountain of Truth.

People who don't believe in God after hearing about Intelligent Design and irreducible complexity, would not believe in Noah's Ark if Noah himself came out of it and shook their hand with all the animals.

Of course God's Word is more accurate than the guesses of humans.

Why would anyone be surprised that the Word of God is correct and the guesses of humans who were not around is not?
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Franklin on August 9th, 2009
Wood rots.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by DudeLer 2 on June 25th, 2009
Noah ripped it apart to build homes and buildings and furniture and boats. Even some was used for firewood.
Comments
- interesting... where are you getting this info? sources please
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 26th, 2009
- common sense. get real.
  
  Report
  
  by DudeLer 2 on June 26th, 2009
- ah the best source of all... intuition. good idea in any case
  
  Report
  
  by FevoIsGod on June 26th, 2009
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
3 comments | Post one | Permalink
by Rude Bear Ready for Winter on August 30th, 2009
Those two termites he brought got really busy.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by Robbo the dog on October 4th, 2009
The idea, as translated in the bible, is of an ark (boat) in our history. The son of man will return in a time similar to the time of Noah. This could indicate that this story is not history but our present. The word ARK is in fact based on a word meaning box or chest. Someone working on his heart (belief within a chest) for 7 years to preserve life (2x2 animals) could make some sense and might explain to the open minded why we have no proof of it's previous existance.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by kgs75 on February 25th, 2010
Just because it hasent been found means it roted away or neaver exsited? Explane the Shroud of Turin/Jesus bareal cloth it's 2010 years old
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by guardian on August 31st, 2009
their have been some excavations to the known potential areas but their are many speculations about their findings,
secondly now it is illeagle to go hunting for it on those mountains, via govt and via the head of the local area (who you need permission from)
3rdly most years their it is extremely cold and snowy there (completely worthless to go then ) only in warmer years have people said that you can see it via snow melt, and it is extremely dangerous and rocky terrain to make it their.
+2
good luck on search.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by bagicide stayed 10 months too long on August 30th, 2009
You do realize how rare it is for ANYTHING to survive 5,000 years? Even those things made of stone or iron are rarely in recognizable form. You might find the foundations of a stone house, but its roof is long gone. Usually its walls have crumbled as well. You might find the bones of a person or animal, but its flesh is long gone. And you don't find the bones of EVERY person or EVERY animal, only those that were in favorable conditions that preserved them. And it is very difficult to find the remains of a specific item even when you know roughly where it is. There was just an article in Smithsonian about a man who has spent 35 years searching for Herod's Tomb within Herod's palace and he started knowing it was within the site where he was working. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/Finding-Herods-Tomb.html So how hard do you think it would be to find a wooden ship that is 5,000 years old that may or may not have left a trace within the thousands of square miles in which it might have come to rest?

I don't often call a question silly, but I think this one takes the prize.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by pugwashjw65 on August 30th, 2009
It was built of timber...and over time, timber rots and powders...It would have been held together with tree-nails....hand carved wooden dowels slightly larger than the holes they were hammered into...and when water is applied. they swell some more making it tighter still...and they all rot away...

And as God does hate icons of any sort, things that might be used as objects of worship, He would have ensured that the Ark did not survive for any length of time...

(Exodus 20:4-5) “You must not make for yourself a carved image or a form like anything that is in the heavens above or that is on the earth underneath or that is in the waters under the earth. 5 You must not bow down to them nor be induced to serve them, because I Jehovah your God am a God exacting exclusive devotion, bringing punishment for the error of fathers upon sons, upon the third generation and upon the fourth generation, in the case of those who hate me;
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink
by timash on August 30th, 2009
Hi,
Amazingly despite being over 5,000 years old.
The remains of an enormous boat have been found by archaologists, underground on a high mountain in northern turkey.
This area is where the Bible suggests that the arc would have run aground and would have been one of the highest peaks of the area at the time.
True this might not be 'Noahs Arc' but ask, why on earth would a 5000 year old boat be that high up on a mountain so long ago?
It really doesn't matter if it is Noahs or not, to have survived so long would be miraculous really.
The strange thing is that the story is documented in all the books of every nation that was around after that time, passed down from father to son etc. and also understood to have occured in most world religions and by most archaologists in some form or other.
Comments
Add a comment...
- Like
- Report
No comments. Post one | Permalink

Question

Why have we not found remains of Noah's ark?

Answers. 38 helpful answers below.

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Comments

Did this answer your question? If not, then ask a new question or create a poll.

More Questions. Additional questions in this category.

Follow us on Facebook!

Related Ads

Related Questions

Professionally Researched

ANSWERBAG BUZZ

Answerbag.com Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!

Answerbag.com
Your favorite Q&A site is on Facebook! Become a fan to connect with the ever-growing community of Answerbaggers, share your thoughts and find out what Answerbag's up to next!